Of course this is just a stupid delay tactic by his defense attorneys.
Jack Smith is the prosecutor, not a defense attorney. With that being said, I think you’re accidentally right. I don’t think Smith would push so hard for SCotUS to rule if he thought they were going to rule against him.
I am not sure about Smith’s motivation being about how they will rule but rather because that is where it will end up one way or the other. This just gets it there faster, and time is of the essence.
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !politics@beehaw.org
In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it’s a political happening, you can post it here.
Guidelines for submissions:
Where possible, post the original source of information.
If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
Social media should be a source of last resort.
These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.
Jack Smith is the prosecutor, not a defense attorney. With that being said, I think you’re accidentally right. I don’t think Smith would push so hard for SCotUS to rule if he thought they were going to rule against him.
I am not sure about Smith’s motivation being about how they will rule but rather because that is where it will end up one way or the other. This just gets it there faster, and time is of the essence.