It’s possible that they could introduce it after a motion to submit new evidence, though the defense’s attempts to stop it from being introduced is a foregone conclusion.
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !politics@beehaw.org
In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it’s a political happening, you can post it here.
Guidelines for submissions:
Where possible, post the original source of information.
If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
Social media should be a source of last resort.
These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.
it’s unclear if this factors into his ongoing indictment in the state for election interference.
I see no reason why it shouldn’t.
It’s possible that they could introduce it after a motion to submit new evidence, though the defense’s attempts to stop it from being introduced is a foregone conclusion.