The decision appeared to suggest that the rights of L.G.B.T.Q. people, including to same-sex marriage, are on more vulnerable legal footing, particularly when they are at odds with claims of religious freedom.

Fucking Religious Reich and this bullshit court…throw it into the fire.

The way they’ve made this ruling while the person at the center or the initial complaint has come forward to say that the entire case was fabricated confirms there’s no bottom to the pit of BS

What was even the initial lawsuit?

The only way I can see this case happening is if a customer sued because of discrimination. But there was no customer. Who was she suing?

TechyDad
link
fedilink
12Y

The level of fabrication would be impressive if it wasn’t so maddeningly illegal.

The guy didn’t contract for a website for his gay marriage.

He didn’t know that guy he was supposedly marrying.

And he’s straight.

And he’s been married to a woman for 15 years.

How did nobody check this out and what penalties can the website designer and lawyers face for lying in court?

Create a post

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it’s a political happening, you can post it here.


Guidelines for submissions:
  • Where possible, post the original source of information.
    • If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
  • Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
  • Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
  • Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
  • Social media should be a source of last resort.

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community’s icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

  • 1 user online
  • 35 users / day
  • 96 users / week
  • 263 users / month
  • 861 users / 6 months
  • 1 subscriber
  • 2.34K Posts
  • 16.7K Comments
  • Modlog