Customers who go through self-checkout must use the device to scan their receipt’s barcode — confirming that they paid something — which opens a metal gate, letting them leave.
How can scanning a receipt prove that you scanned all the items, and are leaving with only what you paid for?
Also, how does this locking metal gate fall under the municipal fire code?
It is probably wired up to the fire alarm like many emergency exits are. They typically fail-open so that if the wire is cut or the power goes out they can be opened without trouble.
It is probably wired up to the fire alarm like many emergency exits are.
And if there’s no fire alarm? Maybe an active shooter or other situation that causes a stampede of people to try to leave the store?
Seems like an unnecessary risk to public safety in the name of loss-prevention.
These gates, if they plan to use them, should only lock if a security tag has not been deactivated (triggering an alarm).
The way it seems to be designed is that everyone is guilty of theft until proven they haven’t stolen anything. And it doesn’t seem like scanning the receipt actually proves this.
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !canada@lemmy.ca
How can scanning a receipt prove that you scanned all the items, and are leaving with only what you paid for?
Also, how does this locking metal gate fall under the municipal fire code?
It is probably wired up to the fire alarm like many emergency exits are. They typically fail-open so that if the wire is cut or the power goes out they can be opened without trouble.
Stupid idea, but probably not a major fire risk.
And if there’s no fire alarm? Maybe an active shooter or other situation that causes a stampede of people to try to leave the store?
Seems like an unnecessary risk to public safety in the name of loss-prevention.
These gates, if they plan to use them, should only lock if a security tag has not been deactivated (triggering an alarm).
The way it seems to be designed is that everyone is guilty of theft until proven they haven’t stolen anything. And it doesn’t seem like scanning the receipt actually proves this.
There is also a good chance that they can be pushed open, just triggering alarm. Based on TFA that is the case.
I hope so. But then it begs the question: will that alarm also be ignored as all other in-store alarms tend to be? LOL
Of course. My argument isn’t that this is a good solution, I don’t think it is. I just don’t think safety is a notable criticism.
Fair point. I don’t know how their metal gates work, so safety came to mind.
edit: corrected Freudian slip.
The article makes it sound like you can push the gate open without a receipt, it will just set off an alarm.