trash
fedilink
@famskiis@vlemmy.net
link
fedilink
English
01Y

So there being more black people in poverty, would selecting more of the impoverished not work towards solving the racial wealth gap?

And why should a white or Asian person that can’t keep the lights on be given less of a chance than an affluent black person with a worse application?

Veraticus
link
fedilink
English
01Y

No, because you’re not targeting the racial wealth gap, you’re targeting impoverishment.

Because we’re trying to fix the endemic, pervasive, and unchanging racial wealth gap. Not something else.

Not sure what’s so hard about this concept. Can’t we try to fix the racial wealth gap? And also, separately, whatever causes you otherwise care about?

@famskiis@vlemmy.net
link
fedilink
English
01Y

The racial wealth gap is a selective problem that is encompassed entirely within the general, race-less problem of poverty in the United States. Fixing the big problem also checks off your small one.

Veraticus
link
fedilink
English
01Y

Great; then you shouldn’t object to fixing the racial wealth gap as a way to end poverty. Unless you actually are fine with Black people being poorer and having worse access to education than white people?

@famskiis@vlemmy.net
link
fedilink
English
01Y

I object to only solving part of the problem in a way that disadvantages other groups. Lifting a certain group out of poverty while suppressing another, entirely based on race is, well, racist. Kinda simple

Veraticus
link
fedilink
English
01Y

So we enslave, murder, and steal from a whole group of people and then turn around and say that helping them afterwards is racist?

What a bad take.

@famskiis@vlemmy.net
link
fedilink
English
11Y

Not at the expense of other races. In 2023 you don’t exactly get to choose what races you value over others. Thanks SCOTUS.

Create a post

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it’s a political happening, you can post it here.


Guidelines for submissions:
  • Where possible, post the original source of information.
    • If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
  • Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
  • Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
  • Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
  • Social media should be a source of last resort.

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community’s icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

  • 1 user online
  • 75 users / day
  • 131 users / week
  • 355 users / month
  • 841 users / 6 months
  • 1 subscriber
  • 1.57K Posts
  • 12.8K Comments
  • Modlog