Biden considering Australian request to drop Assange charges
www.bbc.com
external-link
Australia wants the US president to end attempts to extradite the Wikileaks founder from the UK.

Cross posted from: https://beehaw.org/post/13074556

The country’s parliament recently passed a measure - backed by PM Anthony Albanese - calling for the return of Mr Assange to his native Australia.

The US wants to extradite the 52-year-old from the UK on criminal charges over the leaking of military records.

Mr Assange denies the charges, saying the leaks were an act of journalism.

The president was asked about Australia’s request on Wednesday and said: “We’re considering it.”

@fartington@lemm.ee
link
fedilink
12
edit-2
5M

deleted by creator

@quindraco@lemm.ee
link
fedilink
10
edit-2
7M

This thread is a garbage fire - a bunch of people who didn’t look anything up (or if they did, they cite no sources, so there’s no evidence they did) spouting a bunch of mutually contradictory shit, all of it upvoted. I will never understand why anyone engages with Lemmy this way.

Here is the list of US charges against Assange, from the actual paperwork charging him.

As you can see here, each of the first 17 charges has a maximum penalty of 10 years (not including fines).

Charge 18 is messier. Under USC 371 the max is 5 years. I believe USC 1030 is also capped at 5 years.

So roughly a 175 year sentence, at cap.

Zagorath
link
fedilink
English
57M

So roughly a 175 year sentence, at cap.

Sentencing guidelines usually have specific rules for whether sentences would be run concurrently or consecutively. Charges are grouped if:

(a) Counts involve the same victim and the same act or transaction.
(b) Counts involve the same victim and two or more acts or transactions connected by a common criminal objective or constituting part of a common scheme or plan. © One of the counts embodies conduct that is treated as a specific offense characteristic in, or Chapter 3 adjustment to, the guideline applicable to another count. (d) Counts use the same guideline and are included for grouping under [subsection §3D1.2].

A group’s value is then determined by the most serious count in that group. Then, separate groups are combined in a way that is not as simple as adding the groups together. This United States Sentencing Commission PDF document explains how that combining is done. And this YouTube video explains more about how the severity of each charge is calculated and what that means in terms of time in prison, through the lens of explaining what it would mean if Trump were to be found guilty of all the charges laid on him in relation to the retention of classified documents.

I’m not even going to begin to try to work out how that would be applied here, because I am woefully unqualified. But I doubt it would actually be anywhere near 175 years for Assange even if found guilty on all charges and given the harshest interpretation of the sentencing guidelines.

That’s nice, but it’s only a list of “currently presented” charges, with none of the “potentially other” charges.

Keep in mind that federal felony charges involving the death penalty, like treason (¹), have no statute of limitations. He could easily get extradited, found either not guilty, or that the crimes have prescribed, or pardoned… then charged with treason and executed.

(¹: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treason_laws_in_the_United_States )

Treason is a crime you can only commit against your own country. The US can’t accuse a non-US citizen of treason…

metaStatic
link
fedilink
27M

probably life or execution

if maximum sentence was like 3 years or something I’m sure he’d have bought his own plane ticket

I wouldnt be surprised if this is the type of “crime” where whatever they want to happen to him happens.

If they want life or death to stop others from doing similar then that will happen.

It doesn’t matter because US prisons are so bad he would probably die in prison. This is why the UK has been hesitant to extradite him.

Espionage can result in a death penalty but it’s currently the case that the UK (courts) would like a guarantee from the US (lol) that he won’t be executed. Other than that I think it’s over 100 years and they can add more charges when he arrives.

livus
link
fedilink
77M

They’re a country that’s known to use torture and secret courts. They still have Guantanamo which is one big human rights violation.

That would be my concern.

Create a post

Breaking news from around the world.

News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.


Guidelines for submissions:
  • Where possible, post the original source of information.
    • If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
  • Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
  • Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
  • Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
  • Social media should be a source of last resort.

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


For US News, see the US News community.


This community’s icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

  • 1 user online
  • 26 users / day
  • 64 users / week
  • 168 users / month
  • 663 users / 6 months
  • 1 subscriber
  • 2.74K Posts
  • 15K Comments
  • Modlog