we love google (and LLMs)

further fact check showed that THE IMAGE HAS BEEN EDITED

I love how confidently wrong you are!

About which part? The part that they can remember and expand their training data to new interactions but often become corrupted by them so much so that the original intent behind the AI is irreversibly altered? That’s been around for about a decade. How about the fact they’re “not faking it” because the added capacity to compute and generate the new content has to have sophisticated plans just to continue running in a timely manner?

I’d love to know which part you took issue with but you seemingly took my advice to shut the fuck up and I do profoundly appreciate it.

That’s a completely different kind of AI. This story, and all the discussion up to this point, has been about the LLM based AIs being employed by Google search and ChatGPT.

And I explained to you that these models aren’t incapable of learning, they’re given artificial restrictions not to in order to prevent what I linked from happening. They don’t learn to preserve the initial experience but are the exact same kind of AI. Generative.

You can “explain” it that way as much as you want, that doesn’t make it true.

@BradleyUffner @RealFknNito wow this is just like reddit 🍿

The mere existence of the things I linked you is pretty overwhelming evidence. Feel free to refute it at your leisure.

Create a post

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

  • Posts must be relevant to programming, programmers, or computer science.
  • No NSFW content.
  • Jokes must be in good taste. No hate speech, bigotry, etc.
  • 1 user online
  • 120 users / day
  • 257 users / week
  • 744 users / month
  • 3.72K users / 6 months
  • 1 subscriber
  • 1.48K Posts
  • 32.6K Comments
  • Modlog