Internet Archive Loses Landmark E-Book Lending Copyright Appeal Against Publishers * TorrentFreak
torrentfreak.com
external-link
The Second Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that IA's practice of scanning and lending copyrighted books without permission is not fair use.
DebatableRaccoon
link
fedilink
English
122M

In regards to how precedent can fuck over future decisions, could this now cause issues for libraries in the future?

@yo_scottie_oh@lemmy.ml
cake
link
fedilink
English
102M

Unlikely.

The in-house scanning service at the Internet Archive (IA) differs from the licensing agreements entered into by other libraries. These agreements see libraries license ‘official’ e-book versions from publishers, who charge for every book that’s lent out to patrons.

DebatableRaccoon
link
fedilink
English
62M

Fair enough. Thanks for the clarity.

@technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
link
fedilink
English
5
edit-2
2M

These agreements see libraries license ‘official’ e-book versions from publishers, who charge for every book that’s lent out to patrons.

So it’s not “unlikely” that it will fuck over libraries. It’s already happened.

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ
!piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Create a post
⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don’t request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don’t request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don’t submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

  • 1 user online
  • 133 users / day
  • 295 users / week
  • 974 users / month
  • 3.44K users / 6 months
  • 1 subscriber
  • 3.41K Posts
  • 82.4K Comments
  • Modlog