https://fedipact.online/ for one, but it’s important to realize Facebook isn’t the only company that tries to pull embrace, extend, extinguish. Even lemmy.ml or mastodon.social (being by far the most popular instances in their networks) are vulnerable to compromise. It’s up to the users to distribute themselves across enough instances that one individual instance can’t call the shots.
Edit: this comment changed my mind. In a nutshell, if we can’t keep a large instance controlled by “the enemy” from destroying what we’ve got, then we just have to do better next time.
Threads or whatever Meta might introduce is just a specific example of the problem with a controlling instance.
Bitcoin has to take steps to avoid a 51% attack lest the whole thing come crashing down.
Condo buyers have to make sure they are not buying into something where the developer keeps over half of the units as rentals in order to control the board.
I think the fediverse has to also guard against any one instance hosting too large a fraction of users. I’m not sure that it even takes being as big as half the users. I’m not sure what a critical mass would be, but I’m sure that a large enough instance could “go critical.”
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !programming@programming.dev
Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!
Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person’s post makes sense in another community cross post into it.
Hope you enjoy the instance!
Rules
Rules
Follow the programming.dev instance rules
Keep content related to programming in some way
If you’re posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don’t want to watch videos
English
https://fedipact.online/ for one, but it’s important to realize Facebook isn’t the only company that tries to pull embrace, extend, extinguish. Even lemmy.ml or mastodon.social (being by far the most popular instances in their networks) are vulnerable to compromise. It’s up to the users to distribute themselves across enough instances that one individual instance can’t call the shots.
Edit: this comment changed my mind. In a nutshell, if we can’t keep a large instance controlled by “the enemy” from destroying what we’ve got, then we just have to do better next time.
Threads or whatever Meta might introduce is just a specific example of the problem with a controlling instance.
Bitcoin has to take steps to avoid a 51% attack lest the whole thing come crashing down.
Condo buyers have to make sure they are not buying into something where the developer keeps over half of the units as rentals in order to control the board.
I think the fediverse has to also guard against any one instance hosting too large a fraction of users. I’m not sure that it even takes being as big as half the users. I’m not sure what a critical mass would be, but I’m sure that a large enough instance could “go critical.”
Also it would seem worthwhile not to create all the communities on just the most popular instances. Distribute the communities around too.