They really are. I chose this one because the writing was sharp, and I didn’t really want to spam y’all on what was already a rough day.
But for anyone who doesn’t regularly read Rolling Stone (I didn’t until the Post shat the bed), the political coverage is incisive and pushing the left edge of the Overton window, which is precisely where you want your journalism.
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !politics@beehaw.org
In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it’s a political happening, you can post it here.
Guidelines for submissions:
Where possible, post the original source of information.
If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
Social media should be a source of last resort.
These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.
Rolling Stone is pissed today.
I like it. We need more of that.
They really are. I chose this one because the writing was sharp, and I didn’t really want to spam y’all on what was already a rough day.
But for anyone who doesn’t regularly read Rolling Stone (I didn’t until the Post shat the bed), the political coverage is incisive and pushing the left edge of the Overton window, which is precisely where you want your journalism.