Former military lawyer David McBride gives up his fight against charges he unlawfully leaked classified documents to journalists, and pleads guilty to stealing and sharing secret military information.
🤖 I’m a bot that provides automatic summaries for articles:
Click here to see the summary
McBride’s trial began this week but was delayed by his failed appeal against a preliminary decision that he had no legal duty to defy orders that were against the public interest.
The ACT Supreme Court also knocked back a bid to include as evidence documents the defence team believed were vital to their case.
The court heard this week that, while serving as an army lawyer in Afghanistan, McBride became concerned by what he believed was the “over-investigation” of alleged misconduct by special forces troops.
His lawyer, Stephen Odgers, argued that this oath gave McBride a duty to reveal information if it advanced the interests of the Australian public.
He noted the judge’s decisions meant important trial evidence would have been heard in secret, away from the jurors, dealing McBride’s defence “a fatal blow”.
ACT Chief Justice Lucy McCallum noted the long delays in hearing the case, saying the charges related to events six to 10 years ago.
I was all set to call the guy a hero based on the headline, but apparently the reason he leaked the info was that he thought the war crimes were being investigated too much?
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !news@beehaw.org
Breaking news from around the world.
News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.
Guidelines for submissions:
Where possible, post the original source of information.
If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
Social media should be a source of last resort.
These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.
🤖 I’m a bot that provides automatic summaries for articles:
Click here to see the summary
McBride’s trial began this week but was delayed by his failed appeal against a preliminary decision that he had no legal duty to defy orders that were against the public interest.
The ACT Supreme Court also knocked back a bid to include as evidence documents the defence team believed were vital to their case.
The court heard this week that, while serving as an army lawyer in Afghanistan, McBride became concerned by what he believed was the “over-investigation” of alleged misconduct by special forces troops.
His lawyer, Stephen Odgers, argued that this oath gave McBride a duty to reveal information if it advanced the interests of the Australian public.
He noted the judge’s decisions meant important trial evidence would have been heard in secret, away from the jurors, dealing McBride’s defence “a fatal blow”.
ACT Chief Justice Lucy McCallum noted the long delays in hearing the case, saying the charges related to events six to 10 years ago.
Saved 67% of original text.
I was all set to call the guy a hero based on the headline, but apparently the reason he leaked the info was that he thought the war crimes were being investigated too much?
He is a hero
No. That is bs. Only the prosecution said that. The article notes it too if you read carefully but deliberately (IMO) gives you the wrong impression.