So they want to drive down wages and/or failed at long term management of their workforce structure. Why are the repeated failures of management types across all industries not named more directly?
The 7000 workers is planned to be hired to prevent an expected shortage, not react to an ongoing shortage. Also, the article mentions that industry analysts are expecting increased wages and apprenticeship programs to help bolster the number of candidates. Is there something specific that you think the article didn’t address?
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !news@beehaw.org
Breaking news from around the world.
News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.
Guidelines for submissions:
Where possible, post the original source of information.
If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
Social media should be a source of last resort.
These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.
So they want to drive down wages and/or failed at long term management of their workforce structure. Why are the repeated failures of management types across all industries not named more directly?
The 7000 workers is planned to be hired to prevent an expected shortage, not react to an ongoing shortage. Also, the article mentions that industry analysts are expecting increased wages and apprenticeship programs to help bolster the number of candidates. Is there something specific that you think the article didn’t address?