- 0 Posts
- 10 Comments
As far as I’m aware, a lot of “private” jets are not “owned” by a person. They are owned by a shell corporation that exclusively sells tickets to a few people (typically family members of the “not owner”).
It dodges quite a few requirements and laws required by "private owners, and apparently also obfuscates jet tracking (for example, like Elon’s jet).
https://www.allsides.com/news-source/jacobin-media-bias
I mean, It’s a news site that provides mostly factual information. Their about page lists the following: “a leading voice of the American left, offering socialist perspectives on politics, economics, and culture.”
You should read the article. There were apparently lawsuits up in Montreal about it.
Here’s a wiki discussing the experiments: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Montreal_experiments
Did you know him personally?
Aside from his work as an educator, Bilkszto was an advocate. He was a member of the Toronto chapter of the Foundation Against Intolerance and Racism (FAIR), an advocacy organization dedicated to civil rights and anti-discrimination, which he took the lead in establishing. In education specifically, he was a member of SOS TDSB, an organization working to preserve the district’s merit-based admissions system for specialty programs (the TDSB recently began using a lottery system to admit students, to the ire of many).
“Richard Bilkszto was a great man,” read the statement of SOS TDSB. “He contributed so much to the fight for quality education, for fairness and a better school system, and we are all so much poorer for his loss. Our heart goes out to his family, friends, and the thousands of students and colleagues he knew, and loved, and who loved him in return.”
Yeah…He sounds like such a racist.
Intellectual property protects smaller innovators from larger companies. Imagine if you developed a novel process for solving a problem much cheaper than current methods. Now imagine if you started making some serious money doing this, and it starts to make some noise. What’s to stop Amazon from just copying your process, and making it better/cheaper? They have the money to completely down you out.
Without Intellectual Property upkeep rights, any megacorp will just copy your idea and sell it for less at a broader scale, and cut you out of the market.
Intellectual property protects smaller innovators from larger companies. Imagine if you developed a novel process for solving a problem much cheaper than current methods. Now imagine if you started making some serious money doing this, and it starts to make some noise. What’s to stop Amazon from just copying your process, and making it better/cheaper? They have the money to completely down you out.
Without Intellectual Property upkeep rights, any megacorp will just copy your idea and sell it for less at a broader scale, and cut you out of the market.
Yeah, it sucks to hear it, but this guy is right.
It’s also (typically) modeled in such a way that your software is consistently updated to new versions on release. You get active hotfixes, patches and improvements as they are released.
Most people jump software versions in stages of about 2-3 years. You’ll find a lot of SaaS packages will be priced as if you were instead purchasing the software at those stages.
All in all, if you have every intention of using the software regularly, it’s priced well and typically makes for a much better user experience.
Hundreds TO thousands. And crazy people.
Hell, look at the Arlington Cemetery worker that is scared to press charges because of the threats of crazy people. You tell people that REAL LIFE (descendants of) NAZI’S exist down the street and who the fuck knows what they’ll do. People can be monstrous, especially so when you give them a reason to despise/fear/be enraged at someone else.