@xaxl@lemmy.world Did some testing and it seems that it doesn’t load images through RSS but if you select load webpage, it will show the image.

Could be. I haven’t tried with Lemmy. Will try later and mention you with my results.

In settings under sources, you can try changing the default target to load the full content if the images are not shown. It depends on the RSS implementation.

Fluent Reader

Brexit cliff-edge has electric carmakers spooked as talks falter
Britain and the EU are holding negotiations over the issue but Brussels is expected to maintain a hardline until the autumn.

LONDON — British trade chief Kemi Badenoch is ramping up pressure on the EU to save electric vehicle manufacturers on both sides of the channel from being hit by new Brexit trade rules in 2024.

But Brussels’ top diplomat in London, Pedro Serrano, is telling people privately it may be difficult to avoid the coming post-Brexit cliff-edge this year, a visitor who recently met the ambassador told POLITICO.

It’s already too late for manufacturers such as Nissan, Ford and Stellantis. They are planning how many electric cars and trucks to make in the second half of the year to sell cross-channel.

The new rules, set out in the U.K.-EU trade agreement, ratchet up on January 1, 2024, and will slap a 10 percent tax on new electric vehicles if a majority of key parts, such as batteries, aren’t made in either Britain or the EU.

Most EV batteries are supplied by China.

Britain and the EU are holding negotiations over the issue, after carmakers on both sides warned recently that the new rules will seriously dent cross-channel sales and production.

But Brussels has, so far, taken a hard line on the rules — and it’s feared a breakthrough won’t emerge until the fall at the earliest.

“We can’t afford to have a last minute 31 December agreement, because business needs to plan its volumes,” said Mike Hawes, chief executive of British automotive lobby group the Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders (SMMT) at a summit early this week.

In March, Hawes told POLITICO that product planning happens “six plus months in advance” prior to July 1 and the issue needs to be “resolved urgently” and “certainly before you’re getting into any sort of summer recess.”

Industry’s plea

The U.K. auto industry is calling for the current rules of origin under the Brexit deal to be extended to 2027 — specifically for batteries — when the requirements on their components will ratchet up again before 2030.

Under a temporary waiver in the U.K.-EU Trade and Cooperation Agreement, up to 70 percent of an electric battery’s components can come from outside the U.K. or EU before tariffs kick in. That threshold will plummet to about 40 percent in 2024.

Business and Trade Secretary Badenoch had lunch with Serrano, EU ambassador to London, Tuesday in an effort to find a resolution.

During the lunch, Serrano delivered a message that the rules “are an important instrument to support the EU’s objective to incentivize investment in modern battery technology” across all of Europe, including the U.K.

The EU is also “well aware” car manufacturers on both sides of the channel will be impacted by the ratcheting up of the rules, Serrano said. He intends “to fully assess the matter and find the most appropriate solutions.”

The European Commission’s “preferred solution,” said an EU official who was granted anonymity to speak frankly, “would not be to change the TCA."

“If we can find a better, simpler solution,” they said, "that’s what we will go for.” But the EU has “not taken a position yet,” they underscored, and “have not set a specific timeline or format to address this [issue] yet.”

The recent visitor to Serrano’s office, who was granted anonymity to talk about sensitive discussions, said their takeaway was the EU has no intention of extending the deadline.

Serrano was clear that “the EU wants to keep [the rules] to keep driving investment within the EU,” the person told POLITICO. They said that Serrano’s message was “if the U.K. suffers as a consequence, that’s [the U.K.’s] problem, not theirs.”

Serrano’s office said they “strongly contest the veracity of this quote” and that the ambassador has never privately told people “not to expect a deal to avoid a coming post-Brexit cliff-edge.”

Autumn breakthrough?

The EU is “saying no at the moment,” said Sam Lowe, a partner and expert in U.K. and EU trade policy at consultancy Flint Global. “My view is that this will change, but not until later in the year.”

The EU official quoted above pointed to meetings this autumn to discuss trade issues in the Brexit deal as a potential forum “if the UK wishes to raise this” and request tweaks to the deal.

“Any issues regarding the TCA and its operation can be raised by either side in the bodies that were set up by the TCA,” said a European Commission spokesperson. “As we have said before, Brexit has changed the trade relationship between the U.K. and the EU, among other things.”

The Brexit trade deal “allows modification of [rules of origin],” said Peter Holmes, a fellow of the UK Trade Policy Observatory at the University of Sussex. Yet to make a change, the U.K. “would have to offer something” to the EU.

A change “could be done relatively quickly,” an automotive industry figure, who was granted anonymity to speak candidly, told POLITICO, noting it would “only take a resolution” to the Brexit deal’s joint U.K.-EU council. But there is still technical work to be done by Brussels “before a solution is agreed on,” they said.

Soaring demand at risk

The number of U.K. car buyers who plan to purchase an electric vehicle has jumped to 54 percent this year, rising from 49 percent in 2022, according to a recent analysis by the consultancy EY.

Both the coming cliff-edge and a lack of charging infrastructure in the U.K. could potentially dampen demand, automotive industry insiders say, and put the brakes on surging production and exports which are up by double digits over 2022.

The fact EU producers are “saying they want an extension as their own battery production capacity is not going to be in full swing” means the EU “are going to be more open to considering changes,” said Karl Falkenberg, former senior European Commission trade official and a senior adviser at consultancy Shearwater Global.

Still, countries around the world led by the U.S. are tightening the rules of origin to prevent a third party like China “from inadvertently becoming the main beneficiary,” he added. Battery production needs to ramp up, but China continues to be the world’s largest supplier of raw materials like lithium — a key component of batteries.

Badenoch met with her EU counterpart Valdis Dombrovskis last week to press on the issue, said a spokesperson for the Department for Business and Trade, noting that she is ramping up engagement with her counterpart to find a resolution.

But for now, automakers on both sides of the channel will be taking decisions without the clarity they need, said the industry figure quoted above. “It does feel a little bit more challenging to get as much focus on this in Brussels as in London.”

Leonie Kijewski contributed reporting.

They use magic words “think about children”.

Crash report states it was active.

They have their Twitter for now.

There is !fireemblem@lemmy.world and https://lemmy.fromshado.ws instance seems to be focused on Fire Emblem.

I completely agree with you about polls being flawed tool at best, but the general sentiment in Europe is defintely in favor of Ukraine both vocally and financially. The support varies per different countries, but apart from Hungary who are very pro-russian the whole block supports them in majority.

I have a feeling that if they held a popular vote in which everyone was forced to respond, the overwhelming majority would choose to use their tax money in another way

Not in most of the Europe, 74 percent of Europeans support EU’s backing for Ukraine.

It requires a vote from every single EU member and Poland stands with them and in return Hungary supports them and they both can be untouchable.

She’s just incompetent. Look at some interviews with her, she can’t answer basic questions and has done absolutely nothing as a VP. It has nothing to do with her being a woman or black.

General AI is already changing the fundamentals of multiple areas of life and there is no stopping that. And legislations are not written with future in mind, so even if some regulation is passed it will be already outdated. It might be pessimistic view by some, but one thing is true - humans can’t stop progress it’s our nature. So we will work on these technologies no matter what.

The problem I see is that a lot of the LLM models are already open-source, so the legislation might try to limit it’s usage, but that should have been done before their training. Right now anyone with a simple laptop can download a model and run it locally fully offline. Same goes to other AI technologies. To be honest the time to regulate was when those crappy deepfakes started showing a few years back, now it’s defintely too late.

Just like, after the industrial revolution, we are beginning to come to a shared conclusion that climate change, as a result of industrial pollution, has begun to affect our lives.

And yet we still haven’t done anything to slow it down let alone stop it and that has been an issue for decades.

Yeah, their side project to keep you in their app longer.

I don’t always catch it for one and it helps to avoid try to guess news outlets motivation behind the renaming. Some outlets are also releasing the same articles with few different links/titles just to get more clicks.

Also with how Lemmy suggests posts that already exists with the same title when creating a new one it helps to avoid cross-psoting issues.

They corrected it after posting the article, but I always use original title. Maybe I should make an exception for typos, not sure.

Don’t know for sure, but since the image is credited to Getty Images and they have pending lawsuit against AI companies, I would doubt that in this particular case.

Don’t disagree, but they have plenty of content and if you don’t engage with anyone, it’s fine.

While true, the reputational hit for Putin is irreversible. His days are probably numbered.

https://opensource.org/license/gpl-2-0/

Just create new file called LICENSE in the root directory and and paste the license text into it.

IPTorrents or FileList are great general trackers that both have software. FileList has a very good retention of old uploads.

Assumption that people keep up with the updates is the reason various attacks are so widespread these days.

Yes. EcoHealth received $3.7m from the NIH, $600,000 of which was given to the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

Source: https://www.bbc.com/news/57932699
Full grant document: https://theintercept.com/document/2021/09/08/understanding-the-risk-of-bat-coronavirus-emergence/

It’s been happening but on a lesser scale, last one I recall was this, but with Tesla he didn’t have an active debt to pay off.

Twitter does

Twitter has three large pieces of debt with interest coming due: $6.5 billion that was meant to be sold to leveraged-loan investors, and $6 billion of bridge loans, split equally between a secured and unsecured tranche, that banks had planned to sell in the form of junk bonds.

Source: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-01-18/elon-musk-has-more-to-lose-if-he-tries-to-skip-twitter-debt-payment

It has been done more recently to, inclucing water resistance. E.g. Samsung had their flagship Samsung Galaxy S5 series phone with removable battery in 2014.