Alternative take: Piracy is, at worst, morally neutral, and does not have a significant adverse effect on the profits of the people who produce media.

Calm down.

It’s so cute!

Elaborate.

I suspect your story is not unusual. Piracy is, at worst, a morally neutral action.

I agree, human.

I append “site:Reddit.com” (I know, I know) to basically every search I perform. It’s the only reliable way at this point to see things written genuinely by real people.

To be honest, I would be really tempted to do this if I could afford it and guarantee that it would kickstart a YouTube career.

How would that possibly work?

Pay $44 billion for a brand

Literally destroy the brand

This is more baffling than accidentally destroying the brand, like he’s been doing.

We oughtta arrest the people who pave roads because human traffickers use them to commit crimes.

( As part of the Reddit migration, any time I’m only able to find info on Reddit, I’m reposting it to kbin/Lemmy.)

This is a great idea! I think I’ll start doing this too.

Did you get banned or anything?

It’s really weird to see a subreddit devoted to piracy full of people who really, really don’t like the idea of sticking it to this company.

There shouldn’t be a cutoff, of course. As the current demographic gets older, I bet the stigma will keep dying down. Sorry to hear about your difficulties, though.