• Starfield
• Baldurs Gate 3
• Remnant 2
• Hi-Fi Rush
• Street Fighter 6
• Lies of P
• Alan Wake 2
• Laika: Aged through Blood

The list just keeps going, it’s been an insane year so far.

I can’t believe Shadow of the Tomb Raider was that expensive, it’s such a forgettable game.

Fallout 76 is a lot better than what it was at launch but it’s still nowhere near close to Starfield. It’s a weird mesh of ideas that don’t really fit together but are still enjoyable separately.

Go to ublock’s settings, purge the cache and update libraries. That should fix it.

Ublock Origin is working well again, google keeps updating their script but it only takes a few hours to get a new fix.

Try setting a budget and looking for the GPU that fits within it, everything else more or less builds itself from there as you check the recommended CPU pairings and requirements they have on your other components.

Are the missions long at least or is it something like 6 hours total?

And they’ll complain even if they get exactly what they wanted.

What in the actual fuck

My experience is kinda the exact opposite, I hate how repetitive the planets are and stopped exploring them besides setting up resource collectors.

What I love about the game is the questing and ship building aspects, there is so much depth to what you can do with your ship that it’s kind of ridiculous that it’s such a small part of the game otherwise.

Kind of, I don’t mind the surface being procedurally generated but the landmarks themselves are empty.

Finding a dungeon in Skyrim means a unique layout, rewards and maybe a quest. In Starfield landmarks can’t be unique because they need to populated too many planets but they are also empty, there is never anything worth grabbing or finding inside.

I like it so far, planetary exploration and the ship are the biggest letdowns.

I get the feeling that it would be a much better game if they just focused on what they are known for being good at, interesting maps and immersive worlds.

Guys, this is literally just a tech demo made in Unreal, it’s not news.

It really should, the Series S is already looking dead and we are only at the beginning of the console lifecycle.

They have, since Skyrim.

Yeah, but maybe they should wait until the game is out before bashing it.

It’s the same people that have been bashing Bethesda for years now, they don’t care whether the game is actually good or not, they just want to bash the people behind it.

I’ll play it for myself on gamepass and see what I think, discussion around it has been worthless here.

A lot of people seem to want this game to do poorly, half the comments complaining about it also say that they haven’t played it yet.

Try walking everywhere in Daggerfall and you’ll spend minutes seeing basically nothing, it’s a huge part of why the map feels so huge, it actually is.

Looks like a slam dunk, it’s really good to see.

I mean, of course he wants that, he’s the direction of the biggest fantasy-world simulator franchise out there.

Games are made to make profit, Bethesda made it and have legal rights to distribution, without profit games would not be made at this scale.

I’m not really sure what you are trying to say to be honest.

I’ve been honestly blown away with how newer games look since I upgraded my graphics card.

Remnant 2 is not even a AAA game but does such a good job with light and reflections that it looks better than anything released 5+ years ago.

Then you have games like Kena: Bridge of Spirits, which have a very nice art style but take advantage of current hardware to add particles everywhere.

It’s the other way around. Why bother checking if the request is feasible when you look good making promises?

I don’t get it either, I liked the main plot in DA:O but most of the game is dealing with some big side quests that have next to nothing to do with it.

I don’t remember having many big decisions either, a few characters might die but it doesn’t really matter in the end.

Looks like the top GOTY contender so far.

I have over 200 hours in New Vegas, the map is not very interesting, the quests are.

I already went over how people in Fallout 3 get food, it’s there.

Fallout 3 takes place 200 years after the war and, like I said, the main story is terrible but most of the game has nothing to do with it.

New Vegas’ world is mostly empty and static, the writing and RPG mechanics like reputation are what make the game as good as it is.

The thing about New Vegas vs Fallout 3 is that they have different target audiences, Fallout 3 is a game about exploring and immersion while New Vegas is an old school rpg with big decisions central hubs.

The capitol wasteland is in much worse shape than the Mohave. From what we see in Fallout 3, people generally eat squirrels, iguanas and pre-war food.

The capitol wasteland pretty much works on the basis of scavenging and trading with the occasional herd of brahmin or small farm here and there.

Fallout 3 also has a big emphasis on water, Megaton has a water purifier that is about to give out while other settlements just drink irradiated water or trade with merchants.

The main story in Fallout 3 is terrible but the world building is pretty solid overall.