So… no good reason.

Right, but you’re at least honest about the quality of your PC there. OP above is not. He’s the same kind that complains he can’t run a game on Max graphics 4k resolution while using mid-tier hardware from six years ago.

The thing is that it takes a complete ignorance of the concept of compression to suggest that a Fitgirl repack is designed to overheat a CPU when that’s just how decompression works.

Fitgirl repacks also aren’t nearly as lengthy as he says. Between the time and the inane take on decompression, evidence points to this guy having a shit computer and thinking it’s everyone else’s fault.

fitgirl repacks attempt to stress your cpu/gpu to the maximum and try to overheat your beloved PC,

Bold choice to start with such a stupid fucking lie.

Also what kind of shitty computer do you have? My hardware is nearly ten years old and it does not have this kind of trouble uncompressing files.

Because the ones that do aren’t saying it out loud so they can be found. Hamas isn’t exactly a free speech advocacy group.

Saskatchewan is the Oklahoma to Alberta’s Texas/Florida.

That was originally the reported charge she was seeking. In Canada, criminal defamation is a possible charge too.

No. The question is what you think this submission is because your read of it above is so inane, it’s like you saw something different entirely.

This is actually a great rationale to pirate but said in a condescending way.

Is this submission a direct link to Disney Plus on your app? I see an email saying they’re raising their prices by an outrageous amount and making piracy look better.

They’d first ask other people who also haven’t read the article if the guy is a lib first to check if they should read the article or just jump straight into circlejerking.

Everything is generally more colorful now and there are less shadows and dark areas.

Because I am being judgemental. That wasn’t supposed to be subtext. I’m literally telling you’re being ignorant, but now you’re signalling that you’re not being ignorant, you’re being an apologist for the most Nazified troops.

No one knows what this guy did during WWII but you’re all so quick to assume because he was SS he most certainly did something bad. That’s lazy thinking and if you had any shame, you’d be embarrassed by your words

This reads like you’re either completely and utterly ignorant of who the SS were, or you’re a Nazi apologist. It’s telling you think there’s more shame to be had about assuming an SS member acted like an SS member than you are that you’re trying to suggest it’s possible that there were good SS members.

Like Oskar Schindler, he too was a Nazi but he saved lots of Jews and Jews love him for it. I’ve not heard 1 Jew call Oskar a Nazi but this entire thread is acting like just being SS means you’re the worst person in the world, without any merit.

You already tried to argue about people having to go along with the flow of an authoritarian country, and now you’re reversed course to try to justify “Not all Nazis” while using one of the biggest examples of a secret anti-Nazi. Nazis don’t save Jewish people en masse and sabotage Nazi arms, and it’s fucking insane that you’re suggesting that. If any argument here deserves shame, it’s this one.

We sure live in a fucked up place where merit doesn’t matter and the opinion of people who admittedly know nothing and are just assuming from nothing.

Explain how this doesn’t apply to you.

I also didn’t say Hitler Youth and the SS were comparable. You clearly don’t know how to read if someone is making a comparison or not so you come off as uneducated and ignorant.

Then why did you make the direct comparison in your rhetoric? You literally said it reminded you. Do you actually have that little clue about what you were saying?

For someone who told me I don’t know much, it’s clear as day that you don’t know much.

This statement would mean a hell of a lot more if your contention with my statements wasn’t just doubling down on your already ignorant statements, accidentally revealing you didn’t even know how you were speaking, and making some absolutely inane new comments that show even less of an understanding than before.

You saying I know less is probably a good thing because your idea of how all this played out is pure fiction and fantasy.

Does the fact that he was in the SS just makes him a bad guy regardless of his actions?

You don’t know much if you think there were innocent SS troops.

His Wikipedia says he fought Russians, it doesn’t say anything about exterminating Jews or anything else we know Hitler’s Nazi’s did.

You don’t know much if you think that’s the only bad thing SS troops did.

It reminds me of Pope Benedict being a member of the Hitler youth.

You don’t know much if you think the SS is comparable to the youth group.

The real culprit there is Tania Granic-Smith, who corralled all these assholes into a voting block. They then transitioned from her to Ford once she was out of the leadership race.

Remember when Saudi Arabia recalled all their citizens from Canada because they threw a hissy fit? India has a very proud government and culture right now.

It’s pretty clear these guys put more time into complaining about the videos than they did actually watching them.

Pretty much ALL of Hbomb’s substantive examples from the video are from CTRL-ALT-DEL which is like … the worst example imaginable.

Because it’s a video specifically about CAD (that’s why the video is literally titled “Ctrl + Alt + Del”) not webcomics in general. There are some references to other gaming comics and what they generally don’t do well but it’s preamble for why CAD is the worst. The whole point of this video is to be about Ctrl + Alt + Del and the guy behind it.

And as an aside, really Harris, web comic artists as targets?

No, it’s specifically about the CAD guy. He doesn’t talk about the other webcomic artists.

These and other extremely sane takes from the guy that brought you an almost 2 hour long video on the goddamn Roblox “oof” sound effect.

I’m curious what other “takes” you think he has if you didn’t even realize why the video called CAD primarily talks about CAD.

There is much projecting here, indeed.

Despite spouting a… unique worldview, they are not the one “arguing” with anyone. They have only explained themselves and apologized for taking too much attention. I disagree entirely with their point of view but the idea that they’re picking fights?

No, that’s you. You’re turning this into a fistfight for no reason with this wildly accusatory attitude.

So are some Quebecois language police types.

You’re acting like I’m not talking about QAnon or MAGA types for some reason. Why?

I’m not saying to dismiss anyone just because you politically disagree with them. I’m saying don’t trust a Nazi when he gives his opinion on Jews.

I’m not saying only one side lies. I’m saying there’s a political contingent that only operates on lies, and this guy is with them.

Stop trying to reduce the situation to talk about someone else. This is a QAnon type author writing falsities based on falsely interpreted data, not Noam Chomsky waffling on if something is a crime or not.

Why are you trying to make far right seem better than they really are? Why are you igoring exactly the kind of person I’m referring to in order to dilute the situation and suggest “But pretend like they just have some different ideas” as if they’re not the same kinds of people calling LGBT people child predators now.

This isn’t me advocating dismissing anyone you merely politically disagree with. This is me saying don’t trust a Nazi when he talks about Jews.

It’s not a theory or an idea that most of their arguments are based in lies. That’s par for the course. Their entire MO is denying truth and fact, something which doesn’t exist in even the moderate right wing.

It is a lie to suggest that anyone else lies as much and as inherently as the far right in recent years.

The only thing disingenuous here is your “both sides” bullshit when you’re suggesting a QAnon type should be given the same amount of credence as anyone else.

That perspective requires a wanton and purposeful ignorance of the right wing misinformation and disinformation campaigns of the last ten years.

It’s only irrelevant if you want to act like the author isn’t part of a political group that frequently lies.

(like what do orgs do with the money, how effective are they, are they actually aligned with certain values, who is involved in these orgs, etc)

These are all issues of the organizations own reporting, not anything Mozilla did. Mozilla is not responsible for disclosing the operational details of places it donates to or works with.

The laws and regulations surrounding NPOs, charities, and foundations and what they report are a whole other rabbit hole.

The people who tout justifications like this have clearly not paid enough attention in school to learn about things like secondary sources, misrepresenting data, or false extrapolations.

Or they’ve somehow forgotten all about how the far right has been falsely portraying information for years now, and using a kernel of truth to say “See? Therefore everything else I’m saying is also true!” so that the gullible will believe their lies.

Same CEO, same anti-LGBT organizations getting his donations.