Large language models mimic human chatter, but scientists disagree on their ability to reason.

I dont remember the numbers but iirc it was covered by one of the validation datasets and GPT 4 did quite well on it

Maestro
link
fedilink
2
edit-2
1Y

Yeah, but did it do well on the specific examples from the Winograd paper? Because ChatGPT probably just learned those since they are well known and oft repeatef. Or does it do well on brand new sentences made according to the Winograd scheme?

Create a post

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community’s icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

  • 1 user online
  • 53 users / day
  • 163 users / week
  • 617 users / month
  • 2.32K users / 6 months
  • 1 subscriber
  • 3.29K Posts
  • 67.1K Comments
  • Modlog