Speculative execution seems to be an unending source of woes, especially for Intel (but not just them.) Not all that surprising considering how hard it is to not leak eg. timing information accidentally, but you’d sort of expect that CPU manufacturers would have learned from the N+1 previous speculative execution vulnerabilities. Then again, they’re in the business of making faster CPUs, so it’s not like they’ll just swear off speculation forever
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !technology@beehaw.org
A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.
Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.
Speculative execution seems to be an unending source of woes, especially for Intel (but not just them.) Not all that surprising considering how hard it is to not leak eg. timing information accidentally, but you’d sort of expect that CPU manufacturers would have learned from the N+1 previous speculative execution vulnerabilities. Then again, they’re in the business of making faster CPUs, so it’s not like they’ll just swear off speculation forever