No one is immune from phishing, but some personality traits can make you more susceptible. Do you have any of these most vulnerable traits?
Summary
The article discusses 6 personality traits that make people more vulnerable to phishing scams. These traits are:
Extroverted: Extroverts tend to be more trusting and less suspicious of others, which makes them more likely to fall for phishing scams.
Agreeable: Agreeable people are more likely to be empathetic and want to help others, which can make them more vulnerable to phishing scams that appeal to their emotions.
People-pleasing: People-pleasers are more likely to go out of their way to help others, even if it means putting themselves at risk. This can make them more susceptible to phishing scams that demand urgent action.
Quick to trust: People who are quick to trust others are more likely to fall for phishing scams, even if the message seems suspicious.
Fear of or respect for authority: People who have a strong fear of or respect for authority figures are more likely to be fooled by phishing scams that pose as authority figures.
Poor self-control: People with poor self-control are more likely to act impulsively, which can make them more vulnerable to phishing scams that demand immediate action.
The article also provides tips for staying safe from phishing scams, such as:
Pause before responding to any suspicious message. Don’t click on any links or open any attachments in a message unless you are sure it is from a legitimate source.
Investigate the source of the message. Look for misspellings or grammatical errors in the message, which can be a sign of a scam.
Think carefully before reacting to the message. Don’t feel pressured to act immediately. Take some time to research the company or organization that the message claims to be from.
the fraudulent practice of sending emails or other messages purporting to be from reputable companies in order to induce individuals to reveal personal information, such as passwords and credit card numbers.
Same deal - why would the bank contact you, and why by email? And why websearching this “trustedbank” shows mostly results with a similar but never identical name?
That said scam and phishing work rather similarly: both prompt you to act against your interests, to the benefit of someone else (who claims to be a third party), offering you either a reward for action or a punishment for inaction. The same scepticism that saves you from one will also save you from another.
Not disagreeing, but the article/study seemed only to be interested in phishing, as a subtype of scamming. Only reason I bothered to mention it.
There are different tactics involved in the Nigerian prince example than in most phishing attempts.
The Nigerian prince scam assumes you are a complete idiot, while most phishing attacks disguise themselves as legitimate stuff and often try to instill a sense of urgency, hoping that you act without having time to stop and think things over.
Package related scams are for instance more common around seasons where people order lots of packages, increasing chances of hitting someone who’s waiting for a package.
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !technology@beehaw.org
A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.
Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.
Nigerian prince isn’t phishing.
It’s just a scam, at least the ones I’ve seen.
Definition of phishing:
Here’s a better example then:
Same deal - why would the bank contact you, and why by email? And why websearching this “trustedbank” shows mostly results with a similar but never identical name?
That said scam and phishing work rather similarly: both prompt you to act against your interests, to the benefit of someone else (who claims to be a third party), offering you either a reward for action or a punishment for inaction. The same scepticism that saves you from one will also save you from another.
Not disagreeing, but the article/study seemed only to be interested in phishing, as a subtype of scamming. Only reason I bothered to mention it.
There are different tactics involved in the Nigerian prince example than in most phishing attempts.
The Nigerian prince scam assumes you are a complete idiot, while most phishing attacks disguise themselves as legitimate stuff and often try to instill a sense of urgency, hoping that you act without having time to stop and think things over.
Package related scams are for instance more common around seasons where people order lots of packages, increasing chances of hitting someone who’s waiting for a package.