I was in a discussion yesterday about introducing young people (17-18) to generative text models. I noted that
Thoughts from James who recently held a Gen AI literacy workshop for older teenagers.
On risks:
One idea I had was to ask a generative model a question and fact check points in front of students, allowing them to see fact checking as part of the process. Upfront, it must be clear that while AI-generated text may be convincing, it may not be accurate.
On usage:
Generative text should not be positioned as, or used as, a tool to entirely replace tasks; that could disempower. Rather, it should be taught to be used as a creativity aid. Such a class should involve an exercise of making something.
I’ve been mildly excited about machine text generators, mostly due to my interest in Linguistics. But I can’t help but point out the flaws on LLMs, specially when people get overexcited for what I see as a rather primitive approach.
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !technology@beehaw.org
A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.
Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.
Thank you for replying. This is the level of info I used to love on Reddit and now love on Lemmy.
You’re welcome!
I’ve been mildly excited about machine text generators, mostly due to my interest in Linguistics. But I can’t help but point out the flaws on LLMs, specially when people get overexcited for what I see as a rather primitive approach.