Boebert was kicked out of a performance of Beetlejuice the musical after she allegedly vaped, caused a "disturbance," and asked staff, "Do you know who I am?"
There was no shaming involved (at least not intentionally). People can wear whatever they want. I’m the last person to complain about people’s choice of clothing.
It was an (amusing to me) observation, mostly because I found it ironic that she’s on the side that praises “modesty” and then doesn’t, as usual, practice what nonsense she preaches.
Also, I thought it was really funny how many times she had to keep pulling the top up to keep everything in there.
That’s all my comment was. A throwaway observation about something I thought was funny.
Puritanical shaming? Man, sorry if it came across that way.
Edit: Oh, was it the “good lord” bit? I just use that term for comic effect a lot of the time. I forget it’s something people say unironically with regard to their beliefs. I see now how that could have been misinterpreted.
I’m used to the term just being random exclamation a lot like how “Jesus Christ” or “OMG” or whatever are used these days. Apologies.
No, it very much seemed like you were complaining about how revealing the outfit is without the context of the right being the “modesty” side. That makes much more sense. Most of the time you see someone complain about that kind of thing it is very much from the shaming side.
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !politics@beehaw.org
In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it’s a political happening, you can post it here.
Guidelines for submissions:
Where possible, post the original source of information.
If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
Social media should be a source of last resort.
These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.
Who cares? It is not the reason she was kicked out. Focus on her shitty behavior and leave puritanical shaming out of it.
deleted by creator
Whoa.
There was no shaming involved (at least not intentionally). People can wear whatever they want. I’m the last person to complain about people’s choice of clothing.
It was an (amusing to me) observation, mostly because I found it ironic that she’s on the side that praises “modesty” and then doesn’t, as usual, practice what nonsense she preaches.
Also, I thought it was really funny how many times she had to keep pulling the top up to keep everything in there.
That’s all my comment was. A throwaway observation about something I thought was funny.
Puritanical shaming? Man, sorry if it came across that way.
Edit: Oh, was it the “good lord” bit? I just use that term for comic effect a lot of the time. I forget it’s something people say unironically with regard to their beliefs. I see now how that could have been misinterpreted.
I’m used to the term just being random exclamation a lot like how “Jesus Christ” or “OMG” or whatever are used these days. Apologies.
No, it very much seemed like you were complaining about how revealing the outfit is without the context of the right being the “modesty” side. That makes much more sense. Most of the time you see someone complain about that kind of thing it is very much from the shaming side.
Yeah, I can definitely see how my comment could be interpreted that way.
Lol, I probably should have initially added that context.
Anyway, apologies for the misunderstanding!
No worries. Thanks for the clarification
What kind of alternate dimension did I just wake up in?
This isn’t how things are discussed on the internet, it’s supposed to devolve into a gibberish of random accusations and ad-hominim attacks!
removed by mod