@grue@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
-49M

> implying there’s a “right way” to build an SPA.

There are a lot of standard practices like… using a router to load the content of your SPA according to the url.

@grue@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
-1
edit-2
9M

What I’m saying is, there’s no right way to build a thing that is inherently wrong.

TherouxSonfeir
link
fedilink
6
edit-2
9M

You could build it with no input sanitation. That’s wrong.

@grue@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
-49M

Even a perfectly-built SPA is a thing that should’ve been a different kind of program (a native app or even something like Java Web Start) instead.

I strongly disagree, but I respect your opinion which was no doubt formed by different experiences with web technologies than I’ve had.

Not that it’s inherently good or bad, but the heavier web apps get the more a browser represents a sort of virtualization environment that only runs one stack. I think that’s interesting.

What do you mean only runs one stack? Like front end framework? That would be the point. But it can communicate with any backend.

andrew
link
fedilink
English
49M

There’s no one right way. Saying there are wrong ways doesn’t imply the existence of one right way, though.

Create a post

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

  • Posts must be relevant to programming, programmers, or computer science.
  • No NSFW content.
  • Jokes must be in good taste. No hate speech, bigotry, etc.
  • 1 user online
  • 77 users / day
  • 211 users / week
  • 413 users / month
  • 2.92K users / 6 months
  • 1 subscriber
  • 1.53K Posts
  • 33.8K Comments
  • Modlog