@Stoneykins@lemmy.one
link
fedilink
English
211Y

I doubt they would be willing to let people host and control their own versions of federated facebook, and I’m wondering then what would make it “decentralized” exactly. Are they just using decentralized as a buzz word because they are using ActivityPub?

Cold Hotman
link
fedilink
English
11
edit-2
1Y

aa

They’d probably appreciate to have control of instances they don’t have to pay for.

@foxuin@lemmy.sdf.org
link
fedilink
English
11Y

Yeah I’d love to see some more concrete info on what they mean by decentralized.

A bunch of people paying their own server costs to host their own mini facebook servers that they have to moderate and that show them ads? Lol. Horrifying.

But it seems like they just mean that it will be able to communicate with other decentralized networks, not that it is decentralized itself.

Create a post

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community’s icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

  • 1 user online
  • 71 users / day
  • 246 users / week
  • 574 users / month
  • 2.24K users / 6 months
  • 1 subscriber
  • 3.35K Posts
  • 67.5K Comments
  • Modlog