I’ve noticed this and seeing it all laid out is hilarious. (So, so many JS frameworks omg)

Is this basically so they can forever say: “Well don’t expect it to be feature complete, it’s not even 1.0 yet!” ??

Ephera
link
fedilink
English
22d

I don’t think, it’s as conscious of a decision. Projects above a certain level of complexity will just never realistically reach the criteria one might associate with a 1.0 (stable API, no known bugs, largely feature-complete). And then especially non-commercial projects just don’t have an incentive to arbitrarily proclaim that they fulfill these criteria…

Fonzie!
link
fedilink
93d

I’m afraid most, if not all, of the projects listed use pride versioning, also.

This is hilarious

Create a post

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

  • Posts must be relevant to programming, programmers, or computer science.
  • No NSFW content.
  • Jokes must be in good taste. No hate speech, bigotry, etc.
  • 1 user online
  • 124 users / day
  • 147 users / week
  • 523 users / month
  • 2.5K users / 6 months
  • 1 subscriber
  • 1.6K Posts
  • 35.6K Comments
  • Modlog