Didn’t they say that they wouldn’t never do something like this when they were talking about “muh brexit benefits” and that it was all “project fear”, or am I misremembering?
Because the Brexiteers are notoriously trustworthy, civically responsible representatives of the public who would never intentionally mislead their constituents; nor lie about their intentions when drafting legislation.
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !news@beehaw.org
Breaking news from around the world.
News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.
Guidelines for submissions:
Where possible, post the original source of information.
If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
Social media should be a source of last resort.
These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.
Didn’t they say that they wouldn’t never do something like this when they were talking about “muh brexit benefits” and that it was all “project fear”, or am I misremembering?
Well, Brexit was specifically done to reduce peoples’ rights in favour of companies’ rights, so it all checks out so far.
Because the Brexiteers are notoriously trustworthy, civically responsible representatives of the public who would never intentionally mislead their constituents; nor lie about their intentions when drafting legislation.
I have no clue if they said that, but it doesn’t even matter if they promise so, because it’ll be done by different people in a future term.