Sarah Silverman Sues ChatGPT Creator for Copyright Infringement
www.thedailybeast.com
external-link
“If a user prompts ChatGPT to summarize a copyrighted book, it will do so,” the suit claims.
@AndrewZabar@beehaw.org
link
fedilink
English
21Y

I don’t know how anyone is pro AI anything other than the pigs making money from it. Only bad can result of it. And will.

@SpaceToast@mander.xyz
link
fedilink
English
01Y

I don’t know how anyone can be anti AI.

It’s just a tool. To say that only bad can result of it is a bold claim that doesn’t make any sense.

Can you provide an example?

@AndrewZabar@beehaw.org
link
fedilink
English
21Y

Just wait and see.

Only bad can result from it, just because some company is making profits?

@AndrewZabar@beehaw.org
link
fedilink
English
11Y

No, that wasn’t a correlation. Only bad can result from it. Also, companies making profit love it. Separate things.

Create a post

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community’s icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

  • 1 user online
  • 144 users / day
  • 275 users / week
  • 709 users / month
  • 2.87K users / 6 months
  • 1 subscriber
  • 3.1K Posts
  • 65K Comments
  • Modlog