Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell appeared to freeze during a GOP news conference Wednesday on Capitol Hill. McConnell was escorted away by other sena...

We already have age limits at the lower end. Why are people so against age limits at the upper end?

TommySalami
link
fedilink
English
281Y

To answer your question, most people aren’t against age limits. But the elderly are the single strongest voting population and the people already in power won’t do anything against their own interest without significant voter follow through.

Everyone is for age limits until they would be affected.

TommySalami
link
fedilink
English
221Y

I hope I have the wherewithal to maintain my convictions at that age. Perhaps that’s naivete, but I never became conservative, either.

Xariphon
link
fedilink
91Y

I’m still ardently pro-youth and against exclusion even at almost 40; I would like to believe I’ll still be for age caps when I’m old. Like actual old. I know I’m already fuckin’ old. You know what I mean.

I’ve got over a decade on you, and if anything I’m further left and more pro age-limits than I’ve ever been in my life.

Ditto. I recognize my cognitive slide from even 10 years ago… And Mitch has decades on me… I also realize that the older my kids have gotten, the more out of touch I’ve become… These fossils dinner gaf though… Having strokes on live tv won’t even stop them.

circuitfarmer
link
fedilink
English
101Y

Because the elderly don’t work, so they can vote while everyone else is busy propping up the economy they built.

@BorgDrone@lemmy.one
link
fedilink
English
41Y

We should move to a system where votes are weighted based on age. Up to, say, 40 years of age your vote has a weight of 1.0. Above 40 the weight should reduce linearly each year until it reaches 0.1 at the age that equals the current life expectancy. Basically: the closer you are to death the shorter you are affected by the consequences of your votes, so you should have less influence. Older people are probe to short term thinking as they won’t live to see the long term effects anyway.

@StringTheory@beehaw.org
link
fedilink
English
2
edit-2
1Y

Ah, Dred Scott vs Sanford raises its ugly head again.

When you get old enough to be worth 0.6, shall we call it “3/5” just for old times’ sake? As a compromise?

Pigeon
link
fedilink
English
21Y

What the fuck. What the fuck.

Create a post

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it’s a political happening, you can post it here.


Guidelines for submissions:
  • Where possible, post the original source of information.
    • If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
  • Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
  • Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
  • Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
  • Social media should be a source of last resort.

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community’s icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

  • 1 user online
  • 13 users / day
  • 50 users / week
  • 193 users / month
  • 900 users / 6 months
  • 1 subscriber
  • 1.88K Posts
  • 14.7K Comments
  • Modlog