The US elections are less than five months away, and the public has less visibility than ever into political messaging on Facebook and Instagram.
In August, Meta is shutting down CrowdTangle, a popular social media monitoring tool used to track misinformation on Facebook and Instagram. The company says its replacement, the Meta Content Library (MCL), is a better tool for researchers.
But a joint investigation by Proof News, the Tow Center for Digital Journalism, and the Algorithmic Transparency Institute found that Meta’s replacement tool is less transparent and accessible than CrowdTangle. On eleven key topics, Meta’s new tool has fewer features than CrowdTangle. And researchers say the process of getting access to the tool is cumbersome and slow—and some journalists can’t access it at all.
After all, they wouldn’t want anyone to call them out on continuing chicanery during such a trivial event as their home country’s presidential election cycle…
I wonder if CrowdTangle was effective anyway. Maybe it did not work 100% reliable and could be misused itself? Especially because then Meta is in a position where they control what is a misinformation is or not. I think this is much more scary than any misinformation itself, because it takes the responsibility to judge from individuals and gives the company control over what misinformation means.
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !technology@beehaw.org
A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.
Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.
After all, they wouldn’t want anyone to call them out on continuing chicanery during such a trivial event as their home country’s presidential election cycle…
I wonder if CrowdTangle was effective anyway. Maybe it did not work 100% reliable and could be misused itself? Especially because then Meta is in a position where they control what is a misinformation is or not. I think this is much more scary than any misinformation itself, because it takes the responsibility to judge from individuals and gives the company control over what misinformation means.