Apple Music has already been offering Hi-Res lossless audio for years at no extra cost. They also don’t pay tens of millions of dollars to anti-vaccine conspiracy theorists and shove them in my face.
I’m not sure what Spotify’s plan is here, charging more for something that is the same or worse than what I already have.
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !technology@beehaw.org
A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.
Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.
I use spotify more as a music discovery platform. If I really like an album i’ll download the best version of it.
Same, Spotify is best for music discovery, once I find things I enjoy I buy an offline version and host it on my jellyfin instance
Meanwhile tidal already has better quality at the same price.
MQA is literal garbage, so no, Tidal doesn’t.
Qobuz and Deezer do however.
What is MQA?
https://redirect.invidious.io/watch?v=pRjsu9-Vznc
https://redirect.invidious.io/watch?v=NHkqWZ9jzA0
Apple Music has already been offering Hi-Res lossless audio for years at no extra cost. They also don’t pay tens of millions of dollars to anti-vaccine conspiracy theorists and shove them in my face.
I’m not sure what Spotify’s plan is here, charging more for something that is the same or worse than what I already have.