Erlend Sogge Heggen (@erlend@writing.exchange)
writing.exchange
external-link
Several years in the making, GitLab is now very actively implementing #ActivityPub! 🙌 https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/11247 The end-goal is to support AP for merge requests (aka pull requests), meaning git.alice.dev can send a merge request to gitlab.com/Bob/project.git First bite-sized todo on the implementation path there is ‘subscribe to project releases’. Smart move by #GitLab; through ActivityPub they’re getting a distributed version of GitHub’s social layer. @fediversenews@venera.social #fediverse #GitHub #git

So that people can follow the PRs for a certain project? Or what’s the use case for this

Gamma
link
fedilink
English
37
edit-2
1Y

The end-goal is to support AP for merge requests (aka pull requests), meaning git.alice.dev can send a merge request to gitlab.com/Bob/project.git

In the most expansive version of this vision, anyone running an AP-enabled git instance (with one or more repos) can send MRs to another instance’s repo, without having to sign up there.

source

Thanks :) So since Gitlab can be self hosted there wasn’t a way to make PRs from one instance to another?

Gamma
link
fedilink
English
171Y

Yeah, each server was separate but this helps their users connect between them without signing up. Also apparently Gitea is adding similar support

frozen
link
fedilink
221Y

That’s actually really fucking cool.

aard
link
fedilink
181Y

Github is pretty annoying nowadays - and pretty much the only reason I haven’t left for my own stuff is because going to a different platform will probably see me in the same situation in a few years again.

I still have my self hosted git instances around, and everything is pushed to there plus github - but github is where issues get created and pull requests come in as obviously nobody wants to make yet another account. That might be able to solve just that.

negativenull
creator
link
fedilink
81Y

Gitea is also claiming to work on ActivityPub soon as well.

conciselyverbose
link
fedilink
9
edit-2
1Y

Yeah, this is huge.

It makes self hosting projects others will interact with actually realistic. And, assuming they support forks at some point, migration and backups should be easier than some of the other federated platforms.

I have a self hosted Forgejo instance with disabled user registration. The problem is as you mentioned ,- nobody wants to create yet another account. What’s more, it’s not possible to create PRs using e-mail.

I’d have to give out my e-mail somewhere on the git page then say “send patches here”.

It’s somewhat wise to disable user registration because users can freely fork your repos within your instance then change the fork to host whatever they want.

Rikudou_Sage
link
fedilink
21Y

Nice!

Create a post

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community’s icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

  • 1 user online
  • 144 users / day
  • 275 users / week
  • 709 users / month
  • 2.87K users / 6 months
  • 1 subscriber
  • 3.11K Posts
  • 65.1K Comments
  • Modlog