AI is great, if used properly. It’s a tool, not a solution, and needs a ton of refinement.
My company has spent tens of millions of dollars and a year plus refining our AI platform, to the extent that we’re directly responsible for a leading cloud platform’s current and future offerings. We’re even at the point of them offering their services for free because we’re putting in so much work.
Properly using generative AI is possible, but most companies don’t want to pay for it.
No medicines have copyrights, but they do have patents. And, drug patents are kinda necessary if you want money to be spent on developing new drugs.
No one is going to dump a few hundred million into developing a new drug if everyone can manufacture and sell it upon release.
Patents aren’t the issue, though, it’s companies charging out the ass because they can.
Oh please, that’s the same argument of, “It’s not a bong, it’s a tobacco pipe.” Yeah, they might call it that to circumvent the law, but everyone knows damn well that 99% of users aren’t using it for that.
They’re profiting off selling a tool that breaks encryption and bypasses copyright protections. The profit is the issue here.
While I support their efforts, I can also realize that Nintendo absolutely has a right to try to stop them, and it’s not unethical for them to do so.
Lol, no. ML is not capable of writing extremely complex code.
It’s basically like having a bunch of junior devs cranking out code that they don’t really understand.
ML for coding is only really good at providing basic bitch code that is more time intensive than complex. And even that you have to check for hallucinations.
Likely the same deal with the platter drives too.