Not really.
Now the 15 sponsored links will be irrelevant to YOU as a user since they can’t personalize the ads.
They can still use context advertising which does not use your personal information but only what you are giving to them for search.
Amazon search is probably the least impacted by this, since they use context advertising by default.
You can also copyright the original character and make AI generate all the motions of that character. Since the originals was (human) created and copyrighted, it doesn’t matter that AI created art derived from that character isn’t copyrightable in of itself.
Plus there is also trademarks for character likeness.
All in all, I agree with you, this is a non issue for Hollywood studios.
You can train an effective one for a few hundred bucks now.
That’s not how any of this works.
Removing the Canadian news from Facebook doesn’t hurt Facebook one bit. It’ll just hurt Canadians by preventing them from seeing news from local sources.
Facebook never needed news to keep people engaged. They just need content, and they don’t give a shit whether that content reflects reality or not, nor do they care of the content came from Canada.
But hey, I’m the corporate shill right? Whatever helps you sleep better at night.
From the article,
In 2022, the total number of cases dropped during prosecution rose to 26.28%
So it does sounds like a significant portion of cases get dropped.
Again I’m not an expert on either system, but what I do know is that the judicial system is in dire need of reform in China, but it doesn’t seem like it will happen anytime soon.
The Japanese legal system is caught in a circular spiral of injustice, where the perception that prosecutors only bring charges if someone is guilty makes judges extremely unlikely to ever rule someone innocent.
That’s exactly what I mean. Basically from the data, it’s difficult to tell if China’s model follows this type of approach.
I agree, it’s a terrible system in Japan, but the Chinese judicial system has its own massive issues of an ineffective judicial system, and this data does not seem to give much of a context of why the prosecution conviction rates are so high.
This was more or less a reflection of my personal experience.
When I was in school, we were taught how to do research. It involves going to Libraries and looking for primary secondary and tertiary sources via the Dewey decimal system. We were taught how to use almanacs and even had an almanac competition on how fast someone can find information.
Public institutions such as the Library system in the United States, were our “temple” of knowledge. Public support for Libraries was historically VERY high.
However, since the popularization of search engines, it has radically reshaped our expectations of finding information. We expect to find it at our fingertip, in less than 200ms, at the cost of quality and gatekeeping institutions that filtered out a lot of junk knowledge.
I was able to find a few articles talking about this: https://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2477/2279
I especially love the quote, “Conflation of information retrieval with knowledge”
Closer everyday: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d7Uy0Uznw4E Don’t let your memes be dreams kids
just one more turn and my grand strategy will be complete, wait actually one more turn, but wait there is that resource I need to get before I forget next time I boot up, oh but wait this construction finishes next turn and I need to optimize this city so lets just do one more turn, oh hello there sun.
And the left wing politicians during the French Revolution never prosecuted minorities in the name of the republic?
Damn, what happened to the entire Occitaian culture?
Oh wait, it was deemed an enemy of progress.
If you want to use that definition of left right from the French Revolution, fine, are they not “left” when they literally sat on the left side of the National Assembly?
She really destroyed her legacy by refusing to retire.