It’s not just your companions, which could have been seen as just being “player-sexual”, but also NPC characters in relationship with other NPC characters, which are more direct statements.
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !politics@beehaw.org
In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it’s a political happening, you can post it here.
Guidelines for submissions:
Where possible, post the original source of information.
If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
Social media should be a source of last resort.
These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.
Maybe the fact that several characters are canonically not straight including
minor spoiler
The daughter of a benevolent god
I am quite aware of that. My current Char is in a homosexual relationship.
My comment was supposed to be a humorous jab at the fact that BG3s romances go way further than same-sex relations.
It’s not just your companions, which could have been seen as just being “player-sexual”, but also NPC characters in relationship with other NPC characters, which are more direct statements.
Exactly
Ah ok, cool. Difficult to discern facetiousness online sometimes 😁