Bruh, do you really think the author doesn’t know who one of the largest IT agencies in the world is? Could it be, rather, that they were dumbing it down for the audience, since it’s, you know, not an article about Accenture, and ended up with some slightly odd phrasing as a consequence?
Gives you a sense of the thoroughness of the research in this article.
They interviewed someone, that someone mentioned Accenture, and they didn’t even google the company they just put it straight into the article with no checking.
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !technology@beehaw.org
A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.
Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.
Bruh, Accenture is a consulting company, they provide everything contractors.
Bruh, do you really think the author doesn’t know who one of the largest IT agencies in the world is? Could it be, rather, that they were dumbing it down for the audience, since it’s, you know, not an article about Accenture, and ended up with some slightly odd phrasing as a consequence?
Gives you a sense of the thoroughness of the research in this article.
They interviewed someone, that someone mentioned Accenture, and they didn’t even google the company they just put it straight into the article with no checking.
I mean, it’s not wrong, but that’s like saying that twitter is a platform that provides celebrity comments. True, but bruh.