Elon Musk is betting Tesla on its Optimus program, which he now says will add tens of trillion of dollars...
Elon is the gift that keeps on giving. He’s decided that because it’s Friday, we should all have a pile in.
On a less scornful and more serious note. If he could get a working prototype up, it would be a good thing. Though I suspect that he along with all the other stupidly rich people would go out of their way to vote against providing parachute policies for the economy such as UBI for all the displaced employees.
I hear your scepticism, but unfortunately your thinking is exactly what’s enabled Tesla to grow as they have. There was a documentary that looked at it impartially and unfortunately there’s a lot of legacy debt in making cars and things that are more efficient aren’t used because of that legacy debt. When MKBHD did a tour, he looked at the fact that humans are needed for certain things, so I can see them wanting to replace them humans ASAP. Especially as the humans are trying to unionize.
I don’t know the source, so it’s hard for me to comment but logically the problem as stated is plausible. i.e. legacy debt preventing the move to more efficient methods.
However, the conclusion i.e. therefore replace humans with humanoid robots does not. And then tacking on unionization is just a different subject altogether. You can staff some aspects of a factory with robots and the human’s work shifts from production to maintenance. I’ve talked to automation people and robots can be very problematic and something “advanced” I would imagine much more so.
Although not recent, some referred to the robots as “Bob” blind one-arm builders. If very well calibrated and designed for a specific task, they can be ok, except when they go wrong. To think some “AI” driven general purpose robot is going to substantially replace human labor any time soon… I very seriously doubt that. Especially with that kook as leadership.
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !technology@beehaw.org
A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.
Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.
I hear your scepticism, but unfortunately your thinking is exactly what’s enabled Tesla to grow as they have. There was a documentary that looked at it impartially and unfortunately there’s a lot of legacy debt in making cars and things that are more efficient aren’t used because of that legacy debt. When MKBHD did a tour, he looked at the fact that humans are needed for certain things, so I can see them wanting to replace them humans ASAP. Especially as the humans are trying to unionize.
I don’t know the source, so it’s hard for me to comment but logically the problem as stated is plausible. i.e. legacy debt preventing the move to more efficient methods.
However, the conclusion i.e. therefore replace humans with humanoid robots does not. And then tacking on unionization is just a different subject altogether. You can staff some aspects of a factory with robots and the human’s work shifts from production to maintenance. I’ve talked to automation people and robots can be very problematic and something “advanced” I would imagine much more so.
Although not recent, some referred to the robots as “Bob” blind one-arm builders. If very well calibrated and designed for a specific task, they can be ok, except when they go wrong. To think some “AI” driven general purpose robot is going to substantially replace human labor any time soon… I very seriously doubt that. Especially with that kook as leadership.
Fair