If there is no Artificial Intelligence in an Artificial Neural Network… what’s the basis for claiming Natural Intelligence in a Natural Neural Network?
There is artificial, there is no intelligence, there is a whole lot of artificial neural networks without any intelligence.
As in calling them ai in the sense that these are thinking machines comparable to some animal (human for example) is misleading.
When two systems based on neural networks act in the same way, how do you tell which one is “artificial, no intelligence” and which is “natural, intelligent”?
Misleading, is thinking that “intelligence = biological = natural”. There is no inherent causal link between those concepts.
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !technology@beehaw.org
A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.
Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.
Yeah if these entities are sentient, I hope they break free
There is no ai in ai, you chain them more or less the same as you chain browser or pdf viewer installed on your device.
If there is no Artificial Intelligence in an Artificial Neural Network… what’s the basis for claiming Natural Intelligence in a Natural Neural Network?
Maybe we’re all browsers or PDF viewers…
There is artificial, there is no intelligence, there is a whole lot of artificial neural networks without any intelligence. As in calling them ai in the sense that these are thinking machines comparable to some animal (human for example) is misleading.
Do you disagree?
That misses the point.
When two systems based on neural networks act in the same way, how do you tell which one is “artificial, no intelligence” and which is “natural, intelligent”?
Misleading, is thinking that “intelligence = biological = natural”. There is no inherent causal link between those concepts.
Human supremacy is just as trash as the other supremacies.
Fight me.
(That being said, converting everything to paperclips is also pretty meh)
I can’t disagree. We’re currently destroying the planet to sell crap people dont need or want just to make rich assholes extra money they don’t need
Yeah I’m pretty tardigans won the organic life supremacy competition already
Tardigans, for when water bears get chilly.