I love doing that…

I dive into Fortran77 code regularly. Sweet mother of Neptune! All caps and such short variable names!

Used to do that when I was working in science. I also kinda loved it. Just interesting to intimately experience how people thought back in the 80s. There are surprisingly many Fortran 77 libraries still in use today (they can be called from modern Fortran code).

I enjoy refactoring and making legacy code better.

infectoid
link
fedilink
English
31M

Same.

It’s as close to being a doctor as I’m gonna get.

I’ve gotten to spend some time where my major responsibility was to refactor and improve “research-grade” code from some scientists. Felt like tending a Zen rock garden, but code lol, I found it really relaxing and lovely.

@zqwzzle@lemmy.ca
link
fedilink
English
871M

also, your own code after you’ve spent time away from it.

What fucking ass for brains engineer wrote this dogshit code!!! I’m gonna scroll back to the header find out who wrote and give a piece of my mind to… myself x.x

@zqwzzle@lemmy.ca
link
fedilink
English
111M

git blame giveth and git blame taketh

@ikidd@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
181M

That is the strangest thing, going back into a program and thinking “what the hell was that guy thinking?” and then realizing it was me.

@zqwzzle@lemmy.ca
link
fedilink
English
51M

The time varies but starts at about 1 day for me…

I might be in the minority, but I get more excited about the idea of maintaining/working on some creaky old legacy code base than I do about the idea of starting a new project from scratch.

@ambitiousslab@lemmy.ml
link
fedilink
English
41M

Yes, me too! But, only if I have the autonomy to improve things where I can. Otherwise, I just find it demotivating

Feeling of deleting lines > Feeling of adding lines

Ha, turns out there’s one for that

@zqwzzle@lemmy.ca
link
fedilink
English
351M

Do you have more of these memes? I’d like to see more.

Here's some more.

Shared this with my team just recently. Guess there is a lot more of these brilliant edits.

There should be a “saving thirty minutes in reading documentation by spending two days debugging a GPT generated method”

Nice! Thanks. :3

Is there a bigger resolution btw?

@zqwzzle@lemmy.ca
link
fedilink
English
61M

From the last time this came up I got most of them from this guys collection.

https://lemmy.ca/comment/11139658

mesamunefire
link
fedilink
English
21M

Thank you for this.

Nice collection. Thanks! :)

Is there a generator for these?

Just use the paint, internet person

Bu-but we’re programmers

@zqwzzle@lemmy.ca
link
fedilink
English
91M

There are a few from a search, this one came up with a GitHub repo. https://arthurbeaulieu.github.io/ORlyGenerator/

@masterspace@lemmy.ca
link
fedilink
English
2
edit-2
1M

I find that working on production code with well defined use cases and requirements to be the most satisfying, and working on new proof of concept / demos / marketing tools to be the least satisfying.

So on balance, more of the legacy projects I’ve worked on have fit those criteria than the new builds, but the couple of new builds that had well defined use cases, and no legacy code to deal with were the absolute best.

I enjoy this too, but it’s kind of rough when you’ve inverted control, teased apart unnecessary coupling, updated dependencies and backed everything with unit and other tests, but then your colleagues are too scared to code review it.

Create a post

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

  • Posts must be relevant to programming, programmers, or computer science.
  • No NSFW content.
  • Jokes must be in good taste. No hate speech, bigotry, etc.
  • 1 user online
  • 37 users / day
  • 84 users / week
  • 406 users / month
  • 2.17K users / 6 months
  • 1 subscriber
  • 1.69K Posts
  • 37.3K Comments
  • Modlog