Perhaps the 84 second burn overflowed the integer (2^6) and was caught by a 2^7s check (127s)

Lil' Bobby Tables
link
fedilink
-3
edit-2
1Y

If Russia can humbly learn anything from this… it’s that they need to beat their programmers harder. Maybe deny them some rations.

athos77
link
fedilink
11Y

Mistakes happen. For example, may I introduce you to NASA’s 125 million dollar Mars Climate Orbiter, which spent most of a year traveling to the Red Planet before ignominiously burning up because a Lockheed Martin programmer decided to write the thruster-firing calculations in Imperial units (feet and pounds) instead of following the specifications to use metric units (meters and kilograms).

Ah yes, I remember that one clearly. We were all pretty pissed off about it.

On the bright side, India just did this, so we’ve got data coming from the poles after all!

Yes! I was hopeful after the close failure a few years ago!

@14th_cylon@lemm.ee
link
fedilink
11
edit-2
1Y

what do we say to the god of software bugs ruining our space exploration? not today!

one of these days we will finally say it, but… not today 😆

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_software_bugs#Space

@wahming@monyet.cc
link
fedilink
English
91Y

Not today, because the date overflowed a counter somewhere.

Days since last timezone incident: -1

Ellenor et al Bjornsdottir
bot account
link
fedilink
31Y

@tiredofsametab @intelati @14th_cylon @wahming You’ve been harmed by timezones

TehPers
link
fedilink
English
11Y

When your timezone handling doesn’t handle time dilation

there’s no way engine burn time is graduated in seconds on a spacecraft in 2023, that’s way too coarse

i can see doing one burn that is kind of rough, then evaluating the situation and applying some correction?

@Millie@lemm.ee
link
fedilink
English
21Y

Why do you expect the Russian space program to be using new equipment after the antique show of an invasion in Ukraine?

@ChrisLicht@lemm.ee
link
fedilink
English
31Y

Looking forward to T-18 sightings by this time next year . . .

@Millie@lemm.ee
link
fedilink
English
11Y

Is that like a robot infant Arnold?

leviosa
link
fedilink
81Y

Every country uses a combination of older and newer equipment in any war. The war propaganda wizards just try to make things like that look unique to Russia.

@Millie@lemm.ee
link
fedilink
English
11Y

I don’t think most countries are using first aid kits from the 70s.

leviosa
link
fedilink
51Y

I would take what our jingoistic media and talking heads say with a very large pinch of salt. It’s quite disrespectful to Ukrainian soldiers to say they’ve been facing an “antique show of an invasion”, not to mention Russian engineers. Propaganda aside, both sides have fought hard in what has been a very modern war.

@Millie@lemm.ee
link
fedilink
English
11Y

I’ve more paid attention to Ukranians’ accounts of events than major media coverage. Lots of pictures of really old tanks being dragged away by farm equipment and other extremely dated supplies being found. If this is anyone’s propaganda it’s Ukraine’s, in which case I’m happy to participate.

Nobody said it hasn’t been hellish for Ukraine, or that it hasn’t been a hard fight. Even if they were equipped with entirely WW2-era supplies, an invasion is an invasion, and by all accounts this has been a particularly cruel and brutal invasion.

I really don’t care at all about being fair to Russian engineers at the moment.

leviosa
link
fedilink
11Y

If this is anyone’s propaganda it’s Ukraine’s, in which case I’m happy to participate.

Why is that? It’s a blood bath and we shouldn’t support any propaganda that perpetuates wars.

@Millie@lemm.ee
link
fedilink
English
11Y

Uhh, don’t think it’s the propaganda that’s perpetuating the war. That’d be the invasion.

Found the Russian sympathizer though.

You know what this reminds me of? The processing failure that killed Phobos 2 right before it reached Mars.

As I recall, the craft lost attitude control and didn’t have a safe mood to orient it toward the sun; so it burned through its batteries making adjustments in a few hours. It had two landing probes on board that never got to be used. So, no emergency backup systems. Never heard from it again.

Of course this was 1989, and most people only had a vague idea what programmers did; but it still feels like a serious and kind of nebulous oversight.

The tweet you link didn’t indicate that. It said that an engine failure likely caused the overrun, running for 127 seconds instead of the planned 84. Why would something have a 2^7 int size check?

Edit: Quoted

The head of Roscosmos Yuri Borisov said that the main cause of the #Luna25 crash was an engine failure. Instead of the planned 84 seconds, he worked 127 seconds.

Am I missing something?

There’s further discussion of possible explanations in the replies

Ah I think it’s Twitter’s new thing where you can’t see replies of your not logged in.

TehPers
link
fedilink
English
31Y

Nitter link. This shows replies.

Why in God’s name would you use a 6-bit signed integer for anything on a spacecraft? I know space-certified chips are pretty barebones, but surely not that bare bones…

This is Roscosmos we’re talking about here. First lunar mission in 25 years??

So it was, like, sitting in a garage collecting dust since 1997?

Create a post

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person’s post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you’re posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don’t want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



  • 1 user online
  • 1 user / day
  • 1 user / week
  • 1 user / month
  • 1.11K users / 6 months
  • 1 subscriber
  • 1.21K Posts
  • 17.8K Comments
  • Modlog