OTTAWA – The criminal trial of two prominent “Freedom Convoy” organizers is expected to resume today with a ruling on whether the court will hear testimony from local Ottawa resident...
Seems straightforward to me. It’s pretty typical to permit testimony from those who were directly victimized. It’s also pretty typical to permit impact statements from those indirectly victimized.
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !canada@lemmy.ca
Clowvnoy organizers fucked around and now don’t want to find out. FTFY
The judge said yes.
I love when people who apparently work as writers get stuff like if/whether wrong.
Okay, I don’t: they should know better.
Seems straightforward to me. It’s pretty typical to permit testimony from those who were directly victimized. It’s also pretty typical to permit impact statements from those indirectly victimized.
But your honour it would be devastating to our case!
I think it would depend on what they’re trying to charge him with.
Exactly what I was thinking. This just sounds like it would be a victim impact statement which serves very standard.
I also fail to see how it could possibly be considered irrelevant.
lock them up!