Netanyahu Calls Palestinians ‘Collateral Damage’ As Israel Destroys Gaza
www.huffpost.com
external-link
The Israeli prime minister also called the UN's accusation of war crimes "hogwash," despite now killing more than 11,000 Palestinians in Gaza.

The right-wing leader appeared on multiple cable news shows to speak on the current state Israel’s monthlong siege on Gaza, which human rights experts have warned amount to ethnic cleansing and war crimes.

UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Türk accused both Israel and Hamas of war crimes, and said that the only solution to the violence is to end the Israeli occupation and allow Palestinians the right to self-determination.

katy ✨
link
fedilink
010M

it’s quotes like these that result in a massive swing of support for a ceasefire despite a massively funded propaganda campaign in the media by israeli linked groups

danhakimi
link
fedilink
110M

a one-sided ceasefire, or a two-sided ceasefire? Would you expect Hamas to keep its end of a ceasefire agreement?

raccoona_nongrata
link
fedilink
0
edit-2
10M

deleted by creator

danhakimi
link
fedilink
110M

It doesn’t matter what Hamas agrees to or doesn’t,

So you don’t want a ceasefire, you want Israel to stop unilaterally and then whatever happens to it next is fine by you, right?

Don’t call it a ceasefire if you don’t know what a ceasefire exist.

up to this point the ratio of Palestinians killed to Israelis has been 25:1.

Really? 1200 Israelis murdered on October 7th, you’re really telling me that over 30,000 Palestinians have been killed?

You wanna maybe try that again?

raccoona_nongrata
link
fedilink
0
edit-2
10M

deleted by creator

danhakimi
link
fedilink
110M

I was referring to the comparative death tolls over the course of Israel’s decades long

alright I’m going to ignore the rest of your antisemitic bullshit and just focus on the ratio you picked, probably also out of made-up numbers (and I doubt you included all the Israeli soldiers killed in wars started by surrounding Muslim nations pretending to act on Palestinians’ behalf), to frame the issue without ignoring what actually happened.

Over the past few decades, the Palestinians have started every damn war they could against Israel, including two intifadas, suicide bombings, rockets aimed vaguely at civilians (historically, roughly 1/3-1/4 of the rockets fired from Gaza since 2001 landed in Gaza). Hamas has built plenty of tunnels in Gaza, but no workers, because it prefers to see its civilians die because it makes the statistics more gruesome and keeps their control of the gaza strip going.

Meanwhile, Israelis invest billions into not only technology like the Iron Dome to defend Israeli civilians, but also in warning technology like roof knocking tech, medical tech that it used to save Palestinian lives, including that of Yahya Sinwar, and… Oh yeah, remember the thousands of greenhouses they left in Gaza in 2005 when they unilaterally withdrew? Gee, what ever happened to those?

So Palestinians:

  • Don’t defend their own
  • Send their own into suicide missions—sometimes, in that history, literally
  • Literally kill their own (and count the numbers against Israel in their often made-up statistics, see the Al-Ahli hospital explosion)
@Devi@beehaw.org
link
fedilink
English
3510M

Israeli civilians being killed is a war crime though? Double standards much?

Everyone knows that Muslims aren’t human

  • Bibi, probably
danhakimi
link
fedilink
510M

Targeting civilians is a war crime. Targeting enemy combatants while trying to evacuate civilians, trying to warn civilians so desperately that you warn the enemy combatants too, and killing civilians in attacks that target legitimate military targets and reflect a sufficient level of care to minimize risk to human life, is not a war crime, that’s the definition of “collateral damage.”

There’s no double standard there, that’s the whole issue.

I agree. Why doesn’t Israel start acting like that? It’s minimum behavior for a civilized nation.

danhakimi
link
fedilink
1
edit-2
10M

It is. When your enemy is embedded in hospitals and mosques and everywhere else civilians try to go for safety, it gets hard. But I’m sure your alternative is just for Israel to just agree to a one-sided ceasefire and wait for Hamas to shore up its weapons, move the hostages, and repeat its 10/7 attack, huh?

@Devi@beehaw.org
link
fedilink
English
010M

They have bombed a neonatal unit! You can’t murder premature babies and be like “Whoopsy!”. Absolutely disgusting. As for ‘evacuating civilians’ they’ve blocked the borders. Workers who worked outside Gaza have been forcibly returned.

This is genocide.

danhakimi
link
fedilink
110M

They have bombed a neonatal unit!

Source for this?

Makes sense when they only think one side are actually human :(

Hamas & Likud think that way.

Ironically the party folks killed on Oct 7th would have been anti-Likud types.

Bibi reduced military protection in the south to punish the kibbutz dwellers, and to focus on war-criming the West Bank. Either he figured his trunks full of cash would keep Hamas in line, or he just really didn’t care what happened down there.

He also clearly gives zero shits about the hostages. Hamas wanted to negotiate for their release at the beginning of the conflict, but he decided he would rather war-crime Gaza instead.

What deal were Hamas offering at the start?

Exchanging them for Palestinian hostages that Israel is holding.

@sqgl@beehaw.org
link
fedilink
0
edit-2
10M

Israel could have gone along with this and still attacked Hamas but I suppose they knew there would be Palestinian civilians killed so they wanted the excuse of “But muh hostages!”.

I predict the swap will be done now that Israel needs no more excuse. Hamas leaders will be able to (or allowed to) flee, just like Arafat fled the Beirut siege, calling it a victory.

Netanyahu is going to bomb the hostages and then blame Hamas, saying they were used as human shields, just like he’s been doing with Palestinian civilians. 200 Israeli hostages “murdered by Hamas (using Israeli bombs)” is more useful politically to his war-machine than 200 live hostages.

bedrooms
link
fedilink
410M

Where’s Genova when we need it? Well, we always need it.

hh93
link
fedilink
310M

Rule #6 of the international humanitarian law:

Parties to a conflict shall at all times distinguish between combatants and non-combatants. Attacks shall be directed solely against legitimate military targets.

If you look up the definition of military targets you will see

“In so far as objects are concerned, military objectives are limited to those objects which by their nature, location, purpose or use make an effective contribution to military action and whose total or partial destruction, capture or neutralization, in the circumstances ruling at the time, offers a definite military advantage.”

You can ask pretty much every lawyer that Hamas actually made the hospitals into legitimate targets under the Geneva Conventions. The only party that clearly broke that law without a doubt is Hamas.

bedrooms
link
fedilink
110M

I don’t think I’ll convince you, but…

what you quoted only makes the Hamas facility the target. Civilians inside that hospital are not valid targets.

I agree Hamas is to blame. But that doesn’t mean we’ll watch Israel bombard civilians and support Israel for that.

Bye.

They became the Nazis

Is the title editorialized?

Original: Netanyahu Calls Palestinians ‘Collateral Damage’ As Israel Destroys Gaza Post title: Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu says Palestinian civilians being killed en masse are simply “collateral damage”

The revised title reads as Netanyahu using the world simply, which doesn’t appear to be the case in the article.

The word “simply” is added by the journalist. Netanyahu did not say that.

Create a post

Breaking news from around the world.

News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.


Guidelines for submissions:
  • Where possible, post the original source of information.
    • If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
  • Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
  • Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
  • Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
  • Social media should be a source of last resort.

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


For US News, see the US News community.


This community’s icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

  • 1 user online
  • 44 users / day
  • 65 users / week
  • 161 users / month
  • 731 users / 6 months
  • 1 subscriber
  • 2.5K Posts
  • 14.5K Comments
  • Modlog