krimsonbun
link
fedilink
English
-231Y

download mp3s from youtube. Use rhythmbox on linux and metro on android. Metro even tries to find the lyrics online

@iso@lemy.lol
link
fedilink
English
691Y

Now thats what inconvenient is.

genoxidedev1
link
fedilink
61Y

Yup, can understand if your library is small, but for bigger libraries that’s definitely the most inconvenient thing you can do.

Speaking from experience because I was basically forced to do it that way when I didn’t have regular internet access yet. My library was longer than 50 days. Just Hip-Hop alone was above 100GB.

I used to find a shitton of music that way, but the inconvenience was real. Worst was music that I had to tag myself for example. Love mp3tag but that’s shit.

krimsonbun
link
fedilink
English
-21Y

I find it inconvenient to have limited skips and depend on one service to give you the song you want with the version you want. Also spotify ui doesn’t make sense to me, things just don’t work at times. Not to mention the ads.

@zpoex@sh.itjust.works
link
fedilink
English
81Y

If you pay for premium you won’t have most of those problems…

krimsonbun
link
fedilink
English
01Y

I don’t like paid services, especially when you can get the same or most of the same stuff for free. It’s just not worth it for me, so that is my suggested alternative, doesn’t work for everyone.

There’s cracked apks out there for Spotify if you’re completely against paying

@zpoex@sh.itjust.works
link
fedilink
English
91Y

Not really trying to argue with you but we were not discussing your preference haha😅 Just trying to say spotify premium is pretty convenient at a cheap price

krimsonbun
link
fedilink
English
11Y

I’m saying if you find it worth it to pay fir premium go ahead, I don’t.

@can@sh.itjust.works
link
fedilink
English
01Y

Unlike movie and tv streaming music streaming convenience is no contest for piracy if you’re an enthusiastic.

And this is coming from someone would download albums and discogrpahies, using programs to meticulously tag and organize them. I wish I had the time and patience now, and for the highlights of my collection I will, but with my music craving a music stream subscription is well worth it.

Can I use any of those at the same time I am playing a game on ps3/ps4/ps5 they way they have integrated spotify? I use spotify because it is available on the devices I use. I would use bandcamp on them if it were an option as I love my collection there but, it is not available on many of the devices I use.

krimsonbun
link
fedilink
English
11Y

personally I don’t find that convinience worth it for the money/ads and other inconveniences, but that varies from person to person

balderdash
link
fedilink
English
51Y

ඞmir
link
fedilink
English
291Y

Mp3s from YT are garbage quality, it’s double transcoding from YT’s already low quality input.

edric
link
fedilink
English
121Y

Yeah. If you’re gonna be downloading music from youtube, might as well just torrent flac or at least 320kbps quality instead.

@iHUNTcriminals@lemm.ee
link
fedilink
English
-2
edit-2
1Y

Torrents mostly have pop music ime.

(Popular music trendy, ie Brittany Spears, Eminem, etc.)

@Whirlybird@aussie.zone
link
fedilink
English
21Y

😂 torrents and Usenet have everything.

@iHUNTcriminals@lemm.ee
link
fedilink
English
11Y

Any good spots for oz music? Hiphop…

@Whirlybird@aussie.zone
link
fedilink
English
11Y

I’m not sure, don’t listen to it sorry. Pirate bay?

@can@sh.itjust.works
link
fedilink
English
11Y

Um, you need a hookup?

@DrQuint@lemm.ee
link
fedilink
English
61Y

This is the most 2001 comment I’ve read this week.

Destragras
link
fedilink
51Y

You can download audio from YouTube as 160kbps opus files, which aren’t lossless sure but it’s the highest quality you can get from YouTube if alternate means aren’t an option.

redfellow
link
fedilink
English
71Y

And that’s trusting that whoever uploaded the track had a good quality source. And it’s still double encoded.

ඞmir
link
fedilink
English
11Y

Well if you save the opus or aac it’s only single lossy compression, not double unless the uploader used a lossy file as their input. But if that was the case, ripping mp3 would be triple lossy compression…

@Pulp@lemmy.dbzer0.com
link
fedilink
English
11Y

Any official uploads from recent years are going to be just fine. And if not then maybe their spotify upload is broken too

redfellow
link
fedilink
English
11Y

Hq is equivalent to 320kbps, noticably better than YT quality

@Whirlybird@aussie.zone
link
fedilink
English
21Y

160kbps is garbage tier.

Destragras
link
fedilink
21Y

For mp3 sure, but for opus standards 160kbps is great. I read that 128kbps is generally considered the most you need but 160kbps smooths over any artifacts, assuming the source file doesn’t have them.

krimsonbun
link
fedilink
English
21Y

I haven’t noticed any quality issues and I only listen to mp3s from youtube

You can download relatively good sounding audio from YouTube but you need to be using the right format in YouTube-DL, which not all downloaders do

@can@sh.itjust.works
link
fedilink
English
01Y

What about NewPipe?

ඞmir
link
fedilink
English
11Y

Then you probably don’t know any better because the vast majority of YT uploads are terrible quality. If you have anywhere near decent headphones/earbuds you can hear the difference immediately.

krimsonbun
link
fedilink
English
21Y

Well I’ve used spotify with and without headphones on popular phones, I can’t tell the difference from youtube. I usually download the music directly from the original uploader.

That is what I do, however it is very tedious when you want to listen to full albums, and add info to the file such as the album art and artist. Services like Spotify also sync your Library and playlist automatically across devices.

I made myself a python script to automatically tag and download entire albums from youtube at a time. I use syncthing to automatically sync it all. Quality isn’t the best but I can’t tell anyway so

Fwiw, some youtube to mp3 converters will let you convert full playlists (don’t remember which, but there are a few).

Icalasari
link
fedilink
11Y

4k Video Downloader is one example, but I believe you need to pay for playlist downloading?

I’ve never had to pay, so worth looking around

@jochem@lemmy.ml
link
fedilink
English
161Y

I was big into downloading before streaming services were a thing. Music streaming is one of the few services that’s totally worth my money: no hassle and I rarely have to resort to other platforms to find what I want (very different from video streaming, which totally sucks when it comes to that).

@ribboo@lemm.ee
link
fedilink
English
51Y

100% this. Paying $12 a month for basically all music I’ll ever want to listen to, is just an amazing deal. It’s so convenient. Felt the same when Netflix came about. But now when I need like 6 services, and there’s still lots not on them. Piracy is just so much more convenient.

@can@sh.itjust.works
link
fedilink
English
0
edit-2
1Y

Felt the same when Netflix came about. But now when I need like 6 services, and there’s still lots not on them. Piracy is just so much more convenient.

Yep, that’s the step they forgot: be more convenient than the pirates.

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ
!piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Create a post
⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don’t request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don’t request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don’t submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others


Loot, Pillage, & Plunder


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-FiLiberapay


  • 1 user online
  • 219 users / day
  • 509 users / week
  • 927 users / month
  • 4.94K users / 6 months
  • 1 subscriber
  • 3.22K Posts
  • 78.9K Comments
  • Modlog