Activists and health care workers say the platform routinely suppresses posts about the abortion pill, leaving US users without vital information.

Archive Link from archive.today

Original link from Wired

Pigeon
link
fedilink
English
191Y

Maybe ban targeted advertizing, or that degree of spyware, for all companies, instead of opening that pandora’s box of giving the power to ban social media apps altogether to the government.

Especially since the anti-tiktok bills actually include a lot of other stuff, up to and including making VPN’s illegal.

@Steeve@lemmy.ca
link
fedilink
English
61Y

Targeted advertising isn’t even on the same playing field of sketchyness as “massive and unchecked data collection by the Chinese government”. Even mentioning it in the same sentence seems like an attempt at forum sliding.

And while I agree that the bill is an overreach and absolutely shouldn’t go through in it’s current form, it’s exactly what would be required to achieve your authoritarian stance of banning all social media.

@Prunebutt@feddit.de
link
fedilink
English
61Y

Really? Because you could argue that targeted advertising lead to the January 6th riots.

The chinese government doesn’t really benefit from data collection on western citizens. At least not if they don’t work for intelligence agencies or want to proclaim that Taiwan is a country while being on mainland China.

MrWiggles
link
fedilink
English
11Y

If you think they’re not capable of if not already engaged in PSYOPS, I’d suggest you look deeper into targeted advertising and who is paying for it.

@Prunebutt@feddit.de
link
fedilink
English
11Y

What is your point? Tell me, what the chinese government is supposedly doing with non-chinese user-data that is not worse than what the US surveillance capitalism is currently doing?

Do you seriously think that China spread misinformation about “stolen elections”?

P03 Locke
link
fedilink
English
31Y

Every US bill includes a lot of other stuff. That’s Congress’s gig.

The US needs a tighter set of restrictions like what the EU has been passing out lately. But, that doesn’t change the fact that ByteDance is a Chinese corporation, under the control of the Chinese government, and has no pretenses of data regulations.

@Prunebutt@feddit.de
link
fedilink
English
11Y

ByteDance is corporated in the Cayman Islands, buddy.

They are about as cooperative with the CCP as Apple and Facebook are.

Create a post

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community’s icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

  • 1 user online
  • 144 users / day
  • 275 users / week
  • 709 users / month
  • 2.87K users / 6 months
  • 1 subscriber
  • 3.12K Posts
  • 65.1K Comments
  • Modlog