This remind me of the article a while back that eluded to get the “fact” that Signal isn’t as private as people think, then went on to “prove” that by saying that “an attacker” can see your private messages on Signal private messenger with little to no effort… if they had unlocked physical access to your phone. Yeah. No shit. This “attacker” will have access to everything else, too, since the phone is unlocked and in their hands. Stupid disinformation against Signal is unrelenting. I’m really glad that you changed your post title, OP. Thank you for looking out.
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !technology@beehaw.org
A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.
Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.
This remind me of the article a while back that eluded to get the “fact” that Signal isn’t as private as people think, then went on to “prove” that by saying that “an attacker” can see your private messages on Signal private messenger with little to no effort… if they had unlocked physical access to your phone. Yeah. No shit. This “attacker” will have access to everything else, too, since the phone is unlocked and in their hands. Stupid disinformation against Signal is unrelenting. I’m really glad that you changed your post title, OP. Thank you for looking out.