One of the world's largest investment banks wonders if generative AI will be worth the huge investment and hype: "will this large spend ever pay off?"
PenguinCoder
link
fedilink
English
744M

Go-dAmn Sachs is wrong often, but in this I think they’re on point. Learned from the Crypto insanity.

Avid Amoeba
link
fedilink
404M

Broken clock etc.

And yet, worth 150 billion.

“valued at” != “worth”

NaibofTabr
link
fedilink
English
254M

It’s costing them money, and they’re not sure they’re going to get it back.

@jherazob@beehaw.org
link
fedilink
English
104M

They’re not

Naw if they’re publicly bashing it they’ve already dumped on all the downside risk onto their customers and now they’re net short.

Create a post

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community’s icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

  • 1 user online
  • 147 users / day
  • 307 users / week
  • 617 users / month
  • 2.26K users / 6 months
  • 1 subscriber
  • 3.36K Posts
  • 67.7K Comments
  • Modlog