Former President Donald Trump is out of his depth facing the prospect of running against Vice President Kamala Harris instead of President Joe Biden, wrote his niece Mary Trump in her latest email blast — and he's "terrified."Trump "hates being laughed at," she wrote. "Donald also hates women (espec...
Former President Donald Trump is out of his depth facing the prospect of running against Vice President Kamala Harris instead of President Joe Biden, wrote his niece Mary Trump in her latest email blast — and he’s “terrified.”
[…] “Donald also hates women (especially strong women) and minorities, so you can see why current Vice President and presidential candidate Kamala Harris terrifies him to the point of incoherence. He says she’s ‘crazy,’” Mary Trump says.
She continues: “His childish nickname for her is ‘laughing Kamala’ because she feels joy, and joy is something he [Donald Trump] has never experienced and doesn’t understand. Faced with the reality that he is now running against a vibrant, intelligent, experienced woman who is fully two decades younger than he is, Donald spent Sunday and Monday flailing, trying to find an angle of attack that would stick.”
He’s so lost trying to figure out what to do, she added, that he’s even continuing to attack Biden, despite knowing Biden has already decided to exit the race.
Combine that with the fact that Democrats have seen a massive surge in donor support and that tech billionaire Elon Musk appears to be backing out of his plan to give a pro-Trump PAC $45 billion a month, Ms. Trump wrote, “Donald and his sycophants, enablers, and backers are scared.”
I really doubt he will agree to another debate. But the best way for it to begin would be at the beginning, when they thank everyone for making it happen, if she thanked Trump for his donations to her previous campaigns. She wouldn’t be there if it weren’t for donors like him.
It would immediately piss him off for the entire event.
I’d love it if her record as a prosecutor weren’t so lopsided against truants and nonviolent drug users, but it’s objectively better than having two candidates in clear cognitive decline.
Just remember that the non-violent drug users were likely part of the Back on Track program, in which they would accept the felony in the promise that it would be expunged after completing the program.
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !politics@beehaw.org
In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it’s a political happening, you can post it here.
Guidelines for submissions:
Where possible, post the original source of information.
If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
Social media should be a source of last resort.
These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.
That will certainly make the upcoming debates even more entertaining.
I really doubt he will agree to another debate. But the best way for it to begin would be at the beginning, when they thank everyone for making it happen, if she thanked Trump for his donations to her previous campaigns. She wouldn’t be there if it weren’t for donors like him.
It would immediately piss him off for the entire event.
Yeah, but it could get better, according to MSNBC’s Lawrence O’Donnell: “Trump is going to have to get used to hearing Harris’ prosecutor record”
Here is a video (17 min): https://invidious.privacyredirect.com/watch?v=5JbXbqe5t_w
I love how the election’s setting turned to “two old guys (one of which is a convicted felon)” to “convicted felon vs prosecutor” in just few days.
I’d love it if her record as a prosecutor weren’t so lopsided against truants and nonviolent drug users, but it’s objectively better than having two candidates in clear cognitive decline.
Just remember that the non-violent drug users were likely part of the Back on Track program, in which they would accept the felony in the promise that it would be expunged after completing the program.
No way in hell they let him speak to an adult that can string together coherent sentences in public