I’d love it if somebody created an agi, but this is somehow worse than pathetic. Wanking off to blinking lights, welcoming the machine intelligence as defined by mouth breathing morons
Nuh-uh. My squishy meat wetware that breaks all the fucking time, gets addicted, confused, overwhelmed, is bad at math, slow… er, what was I saying again?
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !technology@beehaw.org
A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.
Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.
removed by mod
Truly amazing how many journalists have drank the big tech kool-aid.
The real question is the percentage of journalists who are using LLMs to write articles for them.
You can give LLM some API endpoints for it to “do” thing. Will it be intelligent or coherent, that’s a different question, but it will have agency…
Agency requires somebody to be there. A falling rock has the same agency as an llm
You have the same agency as that rock.
I’d love it if somebody created an agi, but this is somehow worse than pathetic. Wanking off to blinking lights, welcoming the machine intelligence as defined by mouth breathing morons
Nuh-uh. My squishy meat wetware that breaks all the fucking time, gets addicted, confused, overwhelmed, is bad at math, slow… er, what was I saying again?