The second option. With the first option you’ll end up in situations where you have spare compute/network resource that isn’t being utilised because all the remaining ones in the current batch of 100 are being handled by other threads / worker processes.
Not enough info. What are you trying to actually accomplish here? If you’re stress testing and trying to measure how fast a server can process all those requests, use something like jmeter. You can tell it to do 100 concurrent threads with 10000 requests each, then call it a day.
They’re trying to work out what problem you’re trying to solve, so they can give you actually useful advice for your - frankly - very vague question
“What are you trying to achieve” is a perfectly reasonable question to ask about a deeply under-specified problem
Edit: here’s my theory:
This is a homework or interview question you’ve been asked, that depends on specific context that you haven’t included (because you don’t know what context is even relevant)
You don’t want to admit that’s why you’re asking, because you know that defeats the point of you being asked in the first place.
Hence, you’re being absurdly hostile to someone trying to help, because you can’t answer their question without admitting you’re trying to cheat
If you ask “should I make brownies or lemon drizzle cake”, it’s perfectly reasonable for them to ask “is this for an event? do the people it’s for have any preferences or allergies?”
Rewrite the application to be less greedy in the number of requests it submit to the server, make (better) use of caching. That’ll probably lower the number of concurrent request that have to be handled.
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !programming@beehaw.org
All things programming and coding related. Subcommunity of Technology.
The second option. With the first option you’ll end up in situations where you have spare compute/network resource that isn’t being utilised because all the remaining ones in the current batch of 100 are being handled by other threads / worker processes.
That’s what I concluded too.
Where did you get 100 from? I’m just asking if it’s a real limit or a guess at “some manageable number” under one million.
It can be worth experimenting and tuning this value. You might even find that less than 100 works better.
Careful everyone, they didn’t specify programming languages! Don’t even THINK of providing a few lines of Python that would answer the question 🐍
Booooooom!
Not enough info. What are you trying to actually accomplish here? If you’re stress testing and trying to measure how fast a server can process all those requests, use something like jmeter. You can tell it to do 100 concurrent threads with 10000 requests each, then call it a day.
For most users jmeter is difficult to approach.
Something like
autocannonorddosifymay be nicerNot enough info. What are you trying to actually accomplish here by asking me this question?
What the shit kind of response is this. We’re trying to get enough info to answer your question
What the shit kind of response is this. I’m tryintg to GET help for my question.
Yeah, and we need more info to help
Yeah, we need to know why you need it.
Jfc, they’re trying to help YOU specifically and you’re being a prick?
removed by mod
They’re trying to work out what problem you’re trying to solve, so they can give you actually useful advice for your - frankly - very vague question
“What are you trying to achieve” is a perfectly reasonable question to ask about a deeply under-specified problem
Edit: here’s my theory:
This is a homework or interview question you’ve been asked, that depends on specific context that you haven’t included (because you don’t know what context is even relevant)
You don’t want to admit that’s why you’re asking, because you know that defeats the point of you being asked in the first place.
Hence, you’re being absurdly hostile to someone trying to help, because you can’t answer their question without admitting you’re trying to cheat
removed by mod
No, they aren’t.
If you ask “should I make brownies or lemon drizzle cake”, it’s perfectly reasonable for them to ask “is this for an event? do the people it’s for have any preferences or allergies?”
They did the same a few days ago and deleted the post before reposting
removed by mod
It’s called an XY problem. Google it
What the “it” you refer to?
Google what an XY problem is. Do you have reading comprehension problems?
You aren’t aware of the task in whole I’ve described . What I’ve described is 20% of it.
You and @falsem are 2 fucking sorry-ass advisers.
Yes, exactly.
You’re SO CLOSE to getting it
We’re SO CLOSE!!!
Rewrite the application to be less greedy in the number of requests it submit to the server, make (better) use of caching. That’ll probably lower the number of concurrent request that have to be handled.
That’s not 1M concurrent requests.
That’s 100 concurrent requests for a queue of 1M tasks.
Work queue and thread pool is the normal way, but it’s possible to get fancy with optimizations.
Basically you fire 100 requests and when one completes you immediately fire another.
Op is a Putin bootlicking troll please disregard post