Donald Trump has been using his social media platform, Truth Social, to post propaganda since day one. That was expected by everyone who lives in the real world. But usually for Trump, or really any politician, propaganda is limited to what you can make up yourself and expect people to believe. That’s not what Trump’s […]
It’s a tough thing. Maybe it’s either do that, or lose your job or many jobs in your organization, for ultimately no benefit at all to anybody.
And thus the ratchet tightens. It is only one among millions, grand and trivial all across the country. It’s easy to judge strictly and say you should resist, if you’re not the one caught in it; and maybe you should. But with your flesh in the device the decision is different.
If they sent it in as unsigned, I’d take that as a subtle way to say “this dude wants it and is the boss, but we don’t agree”. Happens often enough in the regular business world too, some exec says do it you can lodge a protest but it’s their name on the action.
There have been some questions about the quality of the source posted in this topic - Mediabiasfactcheck.com has them at a “Poor” factual reporting level. There are, however, a few more reliable sources reporting on this, such as this article in the New Republic
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !politics@beehaw.org
In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it’s a political happening, you can post it here.
Guidelines for submissions:
Where possible, post the original source of information.
If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
Social media should be a source of last resort.
These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.
This is just so weak! Trump is weak.
If Donnie alters one photo, that changes the Xeroxs of it on all of the interwebs.
Sharpies on a hurricane map, just scribble out the inconvenient things and the world is doing bigly good.
deleted by creator
It’s a tough thing. Maybe it’s either do that, or lose your job or many jobs in your organization, for ultimately no benefit at all to anybody.
And thus the ratchet tightens. It is only one among millions, grand and trivial all across the country. It’s easy to judge strictly and say you should resist, if you’re not the one caught in it; and maybe you should. But with your flesh in the device the decision is different.
If they sent it in as unsigned, I’d take that as a subtle way to say “this dude wants it and is the boss, but we don’t agree”. Happens often enough in the regular business world too, some exec says do it you can lodge a protest but it’s their name on the action.
There have been some questions about the quality of the source posted in this topic - Mediabiasfactcheck.com has them at a “Poor” factual reporting level. There are, however, a few more reliable sources reporting on this, such as this article in the New Republic
Changed the link to TNR instead, thank you.
Thanks!