Some commentary on logic in the judges decision https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZT8Nscjcq/
Alternative link with more info https://www.axios.com/2023/08/09/twitter-x-trump-account-search-warrant Special counsel served Twitter search warrant for Trump account
Special counsel Jack Smith obtained a search warrant in January for data from former President Trump’s Twitter account as part of his investigation into Trump’s efforts to overturn the 2020 election. Twitter was recently found in contempt for delaying compliance with the warrant and ordered to pay a $350,000 fine. The existence of the warrant and Twitter’s noncompliance had not been previously disclosed due to a nondisclosure order. Twitter initially objected to the order before providing the requested information past a court deadline. The special counsel is investigating Trump’s actions surrounding the transfer of power after the 2020 election. Last week, Trump was indicted on several charges including conspiracy related to interfering with the election certification.
Interesting vox video about geoengineering. I find the coalition of scientists demanding we don’t even look at geo eng tech, like zero research into it frustrating. https://youtu.be/EKPFZPyQurA
Reformatting body to be readable:
A list of recent hostile moves by #Google’s #Chrome team; handy for sharing with your entourage, to explain why they should stop using #Chromium / #GoogleChrome and use #Firefox or #Epiphany as their main #web #browser :
kagi.com ai summary
Former President Donald Trump was indicted on four counts related to his efforts to overturn the 2020 election results and stay in power.
The charges include conspiracy to defraud the U.S., obstruction of an official proceeding, and conspiracy to commit that crime.
Prosecutors allege Trump knew his claims of election fraud were false but continued to spread them.
Trump is accused of pressuring Vice President Mike Pence and state officials to overturn the election results.
The indictment identifies six unnamed co-conspirators who assisted Trump in his efforts.
The indictment relies on evidence presented by the House January 6 committee investigation.
The indictment does not bar Trump from running for president again in 2024.
Trump denounced the indictment as politically motivated and compared it to Nazi Germany.
An arraignment for Trump will likely be scheduled in the coming days where he will enter a plea.
If convicted on the most serious charges, Trump could face up to 20 years in prison, though that is unlikely.
Archive link http://archive.today/Va5Cd
😀 just want to note theres a call out to this debate in the Wikipedia page on copyright infringement. I promise I didn’t add that paragraph there. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright_infringement
Re: Stolen. Not stolen comments Copyright law as interpreted judges is still being worked out on AI. Stay tuned if it’s defined as stolen or not. But even if the courts decide existing copyright law would define training on artists work as legitimate use. The law can change and it still could swing the way of the artist if congress got involved.
My personal opinion, which may not reflect what happens legally is I hope we all get more control over our data and how it’s used and sold. Wether that’s my personal data like my comments, location or my artistic data like my paintings. I think that would be a better world
Thread where calckey dev responds. https://firefish.social/notes/9hp49vhkce098zn8
https://www.theverge.com/2023/7/26/23808331/twitter-x-ads-advertising-incentives-verification-brands
another change to Twitter’s ad policy. Starting August 7th, advertisers that haven’t reached certain spending thresholds will lose their official brand account verification. According to emails obtained by the WSJ, brands need to have spent at least $1,000 on ads within the prior 30 days or $6,000 in the previous 180 days to retain the gold checkmark identifying that the account belongs to a verified brand.
fwiw I think mozilla’s response was the most thought out response available to date. https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/852#issuecomment-1648820747
Im not sure. David seems like a pretty credible witness. https://www.politico.com/minutes/congress/07-20-2023/ufo-hearing-witnesses/
Looks like another discussion about the same topic happened here. https://beehaw.org/post/6743963
I got you. https://archive.ph/lgBGz spoiler it’s the wsj
NYTimes archive link and summary https://archive.ph/2023.07.18-212946/https://www.nytimes.com/2023/07/17/us/politics/trump-plans-2025.html
Donald Trump and his allies are planning to vastly expand presidential power if he wins the 2024 election. Their plans include bringing independent agencies like the FCC and FTC under direct presidential control, reviving the practice of impounding funds, and centralizing more authority in the Oval Office. Trump intends to issue an executive order requiring independent agencies to submit actions to the White House for review. Critics argue these moves would undermine checks and balances and congressional oversight of the executive branch, and could lead to a power grab by the president. However, Trump allies claim they are simply seeking to realign the federal government with conservative principles.
Key moments pulled from kagi.com
The author is upset and suspicious of Mark Zuckerberg and his new social media platform Threads.
The author believes Zuckerberg is not to be trusted given Facebook’s history of data harvesting, privacy violations, and spreading misinformation.
Facebook bears responsibility for spreading conspiracy theories and radicalizing people.
The author thinks the positive reception of Threads is likely due to astroturfing and artificial boosting by Zuckerberg.
Zuckerberg has a long history of unethical behavior and putting profits over people.
The author worries that Threads will be used to manipulate the 2024 election and spread misinformation.
The author thinks people are too easily falling for Zuckerberg’s rebranding as a “cool uncle” figure with Threads.
The author argues that Zuckerberg has not changed and Threads will eventually become just like Facebook.
The author warns against trusting Zuckerberg and Threads, comparing it to a panther that seems cool at first but will eventually harm people.
The author believes Zuckerberg’s ultimate goal is to control what information people see online.
@TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org done! https://beehaw.org/post/7204920